These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3190571)

  • 1. The use of ultrasound for the removal of the smear layer. The effect of sodium hypochlorite concentration; SEM study.
    Cameron JA
    Aust Dent J; 1988 Jun; 33(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 3190571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The synergistic relationship between ultrasound and sodium hypochlorite: a scanning electron microscope evaluation.
    Cameron JA
    J Endod; 1987 Nov; 13(11):541-5. PubMed ID: 3482099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of 4 per cent sodium hypochlorite, with or without ultrasound, in cleansing of uninstrumented immature root canals; SEM study.
    Cameron JA
    Aust Dent J; 1987 Jun; 32(3):204-13. PubMed ID: 3479109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The use of ultrasound in endodontics: S.E.M. study and clinical controls].
    Castellucci A; Becciani R; Bertelli E
    Dent Cadmos; 1987 Jan; 55(1):27-9, 31-2, 35-42 passim. PubMed ID: 3477484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of radicular dentin erosion and smear layer removal capacity of Self-Adjusting File using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite as an initial irrigant.
    Kaya S; Yiğit-Özer S; Adigüzel Ö
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 21664155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study.
    Metzger Z; Teperovich E; Cohen R; Zary R; Paqué F; Hülsmann M
    J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 20307746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Experimental scanning electron microscope study of manual and mechanical canal irrigation].
    La Torre G; Malagnino G
    G Endodonzia; 1990; 4(2):17-21. PubMed ID: 2135039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of ultrasonics in the removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscope study.
    Cameron JA
    J Endod; 1983 Jul; 9(7):289-92. PubMed ID: 6579185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The choice of irrigant during hand instrumentation and ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a scanning electron microscope study.
    Cameron JA
    Aust Dent J; 1995 Apr; 40(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 7786235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Ultrasound in endodontics: S.E.M. verification].
    Rengo S; Carano A; Giorgetti M; Simeone M; Valletta R
    G Ital Endod; 1990; 4(4):29-35. PubMed ID: 2133817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of three methods of cleaning and shaping the root canal in vitro.
    Goldman M; White RR; Moser CR; Tenca JI
    J Endod; 1988 Jan; 14(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 3162937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smeared layer on root canal walls.
    Mader CL; Baumgartner JC; Peters DD
    J Endod; 1984 Oct; 10(10):477-83. PubMed ID: 6593410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Six percent citric acid better than hydrogen peroxide in removing smear layer: an in vitro pilot study.
    Salama FS; Abdelmegid FY
    Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(6):424-6. PubMed ID: 7854949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An SEM study of the effects of different irrigation sequences and ultrasonics.
    Abbott PV; Heijkoop PS; Cardaci SC; Hume WR; Heithersay GS
    Int Endod J; 1991 Nov; 24(6):308-16. PubMed ID: 1820364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of ultrasonic debridement comparing sodium hypochlorite and Bardac-22.
    Panighi MM; Jacquot B
    J Endod; 1995 May; 21(5):272-8. PubMed ID: 7673831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of different irrigant agitation techniques on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopy study.
    Rödig T; Döllmann S; Konietschke F; Drebenstedt S; Hülsmann M
    J Endod; 2010 Dec; 36(12):1983-7. PubMed ID: 21092817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution and gel for smear layer removal.
    Dotto SR; Travassos RM; de Oliveira EP; Machado ME; Martins JL
    Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 17697246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Cleansing of the root canal with the endosonic system].
    Schroeder A; Opitz S
    ZWR; 1987 May; 96(5):468-9. PubMed ID: 3475876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Manual and ultrasonic instrumentation. Evaluation of efficiency in cleaning root canal walls].
    Goldberg F; Massone EJ
    Rev Esp Endodoncia; 1985 Sep; 3(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 3939260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
    Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
    Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.