These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31906613)

  • 1. Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Restenosis after an Initial Decompression Surgery.
    Nakashima H; Kanemura T; Satake K; Ito K; Ishikawa Y; Ouchida J; Segi N; Yamaguchi H; Imagama S
    Asian Spine J; 2020 Jun; 14(3):305-311. PubMed ID: 31906613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in revision surgery for restenosis after posterior decompression.
    Kudo Y; Okano I; Toyone T; Matsuoka A; Maruyama H; Yamamura R; Ishikawa K; Hayakawa C; Tani S; Sekimizu M; Hoshino Y; Ozawa T; Shirahata T; Fujita M; Oshita Y; Emori H; Omata H; Inagaki K
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E11. PubMed ID: 32871574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Indirect Decompression on MRI Chronologically Progresses After Immediate Postlateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Results From a Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up.
    Nakashima H; Kanemura T; Satake K; Ishikawa Y; Ouchida J; Segi N; Yamaguchi H; Imagama S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Dec; 44(24):E1411-E1418. PubMed ID: 31365515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-reported Quality of Life Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Nakashima H; Kanemura T; Satake K; Ito K; Tanaka S; Ouchida J; Segi N; Kobayashi K; Ando K; Ishiguro N; Imagama S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Sep; 45(18):E1172-E1178. PubMed ID: 32341307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Indirect decompression via oblique lateral interbody fusion for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study with direct decompression transforaminal/posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Shimizu T; Fujibayashi S; Otsuki B; Murata K; Matsuda S
    Spine J; 2021 Jun; 21(6):963-971. PubMed ID: 33540124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparative Study of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Pawar AY; Hughes AP; Sama AA; Girardi FP; Lebl DR; Cammisa FP
    Asian Spine J; 2015 Oct; 9(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 26435782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology: A Comparative Study With Conventional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Park HY; Kim YH; Ha KY; Kim SI; Min HK; Oh IS; Seo JY; Chang DG; Park JT
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Dec; 32(10):E426-E433. PubMed ID: 30839417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) reduces total lifetime cost compared with posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a cost-utility analysis in Thailand.
    Boonsirikamchai W; Phisalpapra P; Kositamongkol C; Korwutthikulrangsri E; Ruangchainikom M; Sutipornpalangkul W
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Feb; 18(1):115. PubMed ID: 36797750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion without decompression for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5.
    Campbell PG; Nunley PD; Cavanaugh D; Kerr E; Utter PA; Frank K; Stone M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E6. PubMed ID: 29290128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Radiographic Outcomes of Lateral and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Kyphosis.
    Nakashima H; Kanemura T; Satake K; Ishikawa Y; Ouchida J; Segi N; Yamaguchi H; Imagama S
    Asian Spine J; 2019 Jun; 13(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 30691257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Tricalcium Phosphate and Iliac Bone Graft Compared With Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Local Bone Graft in Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery in Thailand.
    Tirawanish P; Phisalprapa P; Kositamongkol C; Korwutthikulrangsri E; Ruangchainikom M; Sutipornpalangkul W
    Int J Spine Surg; 2024 Nov; 18(5):490-501. PubMed ID: 38886013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion (LLIF): Comparative Effectiveness and Safety versus PLIF/TLIF and Predictive Factors Affecting LLIF Outcome.
    Barbagallo GM; Albanese V; Raich AL; Dettori JR; Sherry N; Balsano M
    Evid Based Spine Care J; 2014 Apr; 5(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 24715870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration following previous lumbar fusion.
    Louie PK; Varthi AG; Narain AS; Lei V; Bohl DD; Shifflett GD; Phillips FM
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2025-2032. PubMed ID: 29679730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is Direct Decompression Necessary for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF)? A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Direct and Indirect Decompression With LLIF in Selected Patients.
    Limthongkul W; Thanapura C; Jitpakdee K; Praisarnti P; Kotheeranurak V; Yingsakmongkol W; Tanasansomboon T; Singhatanadgige W
    Neurospine; 2024 Mar; 21(1):342-351. PubMed ID: 38569646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study.
    Sakaura H; Miwa T; Yamashita T; Kuroda Y; Ohwada T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):591-595. PubMed ID: 27231813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature.
    Joseph JR; Smith BW; La Marca F; Park P
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E4. PubMed ID: 26424344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Which Approach Is Advantageous to Preventing Development of Adjacent Segment Disease? Comparative Analysis of 3 Different Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques (ALIF, LLIF, and PLIF) in L4-5 Spondylolisthesis.
    Lee CW; Yoon KJ; Ha SS
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Sep; 105():612-622. PubMed ID: 28602928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Graft subsidence as a predictor of revision surgery following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
    Tempel ZJ; McDowell MM; Panczykowski DM; Gandhoke GS; Hamilton DK; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 29125429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reasons for revision following stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
    Nguyen AQ; Harvey JP; Khanna K; Basques BA; Harada GK; Phillips FM; Singh K; Dewald C; An HS; Colman MW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Jul; 35(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 33930870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.