These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31906908)
1. Replicating state Quitline innovations to increase reach: findings from three states. Keller PA; Lien RK; Beebe LA; Parker J; Klein P; Lachter RB; Gillaspy S BMC Public Health; 2020 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 31906908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. They Came, But Will They Come Back? An Observational Study of Re-Enrollment Predictors for the Oklahoma Tobacco Helpline. Beebe LA; Boeckman LM; Klein PG; Saul JE; Gillaspy SR Am J Health Promot; 2020 Mar; 34(3):261-268. PubMed ID: 31878792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact and Effectiveness of a Stand-Alone NRT Starter Kit in a Statewide Tobacco Cessation Program. Kerr AN; Schillo BA; Keller PA; Lachter RB; Lien RK; Zook HG Am J Health Promot; 2019 Feb; 33(2):183-190. PubMed ID: 29747516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increasing reach by offering choices: Results from an innovative model for statewide services for smoking cessation. Keller PA; Schillo BA; Kerr AN; Lien RK; Saul J; Dreher M; Lachter RB Prev Med; 2016 Oct; 91():96-102. PubMed ID: 27514248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Online Versus Telephone Registration: Differences in Quitline Participant Characteristics. Keller PA; Lachter RB; Lien RK; Klein J Am J Prev Med; 2021 Mar; 60(3 Suppl 2):S136-S141. PubMed ID: 33663701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tobacco User Characteristics and Outcomes Related to Intensity of Quitline Program Use: Results From Minnesota and Pennsylvania. Lien RK; Schillo BA; Mast JL; Lukowski AV; Greenseid LO; Keith JD; Keller PA J Public Health Manag Pract; 2016; 22(5):E36-46. PubMed ID: 27479313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased reach and effectiveness of a statewide tobacco quitline after the addition of access to free nicotine replacement therapy. An LC; Schillo BA; Kavanaugh AM; Lachter RB; Luxenberg MG; Wendling AH; Joseph AM Tob Control; 2006 Aug; 15(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 16885577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of a state-sponsored mass media campaign on use of telephone quitline and web-based cessation services. Duke JC; Mann N; Davis KC; MacMonegle A; Allen J; Porter L Prev Chronic Dis; 2014 Dec; 11():E225. PubMed ID: 25539129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Never Quit Trying: Reengaging Tobacco Users in Statewide Cessation Services. Vickerman KA; Keller PA; Deprey M; Lachter RB; Jenssen J; Dreher M J Public Health Manag Pract; 2018; 24(3):e25-e33. PubMed ID: 28832435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Engaging Smokeless Tobacco Users in Population-Based Cessation Services: Findings From an Observational Study. Keller PA; Boyle RG; Lien RK; Christiansen B; Kobinsky K J Public Health Manag Pract; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 27(4):E173-E176. PubMed ID: 29889172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Expanding access to nicotine replacement therapy through Minnesota's QUITLINE partnership. Schillo BA; Wendling A; Saul J; Luxenberg MG; Lachter R; Christenson M; An LC Tob Control; 2007 Dec; 16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i37-41. PubMed ID: 18048630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical faxed referrals to a tobacco quitline: reach, enrollment, and participant characteristics. Willett JG; Hood NE; Burns EK; Swetlick JL; Wilson SM; Lang DA; Levinson AH Am J Prev Med; 2009 Apr; 36(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 19201150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the New York State Smokers' Quitline Reach, Services Offered, and Quit Outcomes to 44 Other State Quitlines, 2010 to 2015. Mann N; Nonnemaker J; Chapman L; Shaikh A; Thompson J; Juster H Am J Health Promot; 2018 Jun; 32(5):1264-1272. PubMed ID: 28805074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of a Temporary NRT Enhancement in a State Quitline and Web-Based Program. Cole S; Suter C; Nash C; Pollard J Am J Health Promot; 2018 Jun; 32(5):1206-1213. PubMed ID: 27810948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) use during smoking cessation: a qualitative study of 40 Oklahoma quitline callers. Vickerman KA; Beebe LA; Schauer GL; Magnusson B; King BA BMJ Open; 2017 Apr; 7(4):e013079. PubMed ID: 28365587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Seizing an opportunity: increasing use of cessation services following a tobacco tax increase. Keller PA; Greenseid LO; Christenson M; Boyle RG; Schillo BA BMC Public Health; 2015 Apr; 15():354. PubMed ID: 25880373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Effect of Survey Nonresponse on Quitline Abstinence Rates: Implications for Practice. Lien RK; Schillo BA; Goto CJ; Porter L Nicotine Tob Res; 2016 Jan; 18(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 25646347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cessation Outcomes Among Quitline Callers in Three States During a National Tobacco Education Campaign. Vickerman KA; Zhang L; Malarcher A; Mowery P; Nash C Prev Chronic Dis; 2015 Jul; 12():E110. PubMed ID: 26182145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utilizing Reach Ratios to Assess Menthol Cigarette Smoker Enrollment in Quitline Services. D'Silva J; Lien RK; Lachter R; Keller PA Am J Prev Med; 2021 Mar; 60(3 Suppl 2):S123-S127. PubMed ID: 33663699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utilization of a Web-based vs integrated phone/Web cessation program among 140,000 tobacco users: an evaluation across 10 free state quitlines. Nash CM; Vickerman KA; Kellogg ES; Zbikowski SM J Med Internet Res; 2015 Feb; 17(2):e36. PubMed ID: 25673013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]