BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31907122)

  • 1. [Values of Minimal Apparent Diffusion Coefficient,Difference between Ratios of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients,and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features in Diagnosing Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ with Microinvasion].
    Wu P; Cui L; Guo BH; Wang YC; Cui JS
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2019 Dec; 41(6):737-745. PubMed ID: 31907122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Predict Grade, Microinvasion, and Invasion in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast.
    Hussein H; Chung C; Moshonov H; Miller N; Kulkarni SR; Scaranelo AM
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1483-8. PubMed ID: 26391856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk stratification of ductal carcinoma in situ using whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
    Kim JY; Kim JJ; Lee JW; Lee NK; Lee G; Kang T; Park H; Son YH; Grimm R
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):485-493. PubMed ID: 30073498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Histogram analysis of volume-based apparent diffusion coefficient in breast cancer.
    Park GE; Kim SH; Kim EJ; Kang BJ; Park MS
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 28273747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic Usefulness of Combination of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and T2WI, Including Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Breast Lesions: Assessment of Histologic Grade.
    Kim KW; Kuzmiak CM; Kim YJ; Seo JY; Jung HK; Lee MS
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):643-652. PubMed ID: 29339079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for the differentiation of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Bogner W; Spick C; Bagó-Horváth Z; Weber M; Helbich T; Baltzer P
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 25333308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Diagnostic efficiency of decline rate of signal intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient with different b values for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions on diffusion-weighted 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging].
    Jiang J; Liu W; Ye Y; Wang R; Li F; Peng C
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jun; 94(23):1804-7. PubMed ID: 25154847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ grade: a model incorporating dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted breast MR imaging parameters.
    Rahbar H; Partridge SC; Demartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Allison KH; Peacock S; Lehman CD
    Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 22517955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study.
    Iima M; Le Bihan D; Okumura R; Okada T; Fujimoto K; Kanao S; Tanaka S; Fujimoto M; Sakashita H; Togashi K
    Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 21633054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Differential diagnosis for breast ductal carcinoma in situ and plasma cell mastitis by magnetic resonance imaging].
    Yang Y; Huang Y; Li P; Hu J; Jiang B; Zhou X; Tan F
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Oct; 43(10):1123-1130. PubMed ID: 30523234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast lesion characterization using whole-lesion histogram analysis with stretched-exponential diffusion model.
    Liu C; Wang K; Li X; Zhang J; Ding J; Spuhler K; Duong T; Liang C; Huang C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 47(6):1701-1710. PubMed ID: 29165847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic performance of ADC for Non-mass-like breast lesions on MR imaging.
    Imamura T; Isomoto I; Sueyoshi E; Yano H; Uga T; Abe K; Hayashi T; Honda S; Yamaguchi T; Uetani M
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2010; 9(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 21187691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preoperative clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging features can predict ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive components.
    Lee CW; Wu HK; Lai HW; Wu WP; Chen ST; Chen DR; Chen CJ; Kuo SJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):780-9. PubMed ID: 26971424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positive enhancement integral values in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of breast carcinoma: ductal carcinoma in situ vs. invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Nadrljanski M; Maksimović R; Plešinac-Karapandžić V; Nikitović M; Marković-Vasiljković B; Milošević Z
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1363-7. PubMed ID: 24894697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic performance of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value in differentiating the invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma
    Zhao S; Shao G; Chen P; Li L; Yang Y; Zhao X; Guo W
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(4):871-875. PubMed ID: 31436245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
    Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diffusion-tensor imaging as an adjunct to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for improved accuracy of differential diagnosis between breast ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast carcinoma.
    Wang Y; Zhang X; Cao K; Li Y; Li X; Qi L; Tang L; Wang Z; Gao S
    Chin J Cancer Res; 2015 Apr; 27(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 25937784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can MRI biomarkers at 3 T identify low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ?
    Rahbar H; Parsian S; Lam DL; Dontchos BN; Andeen NK; Rendi MH; Lehman CD; Partridge SC
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 26365872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of diffusion weighted imaging as supplement to dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI: Can it help predict malignancy, histologic grade and recurrence?
    Roknsharifi S; Fishman MDC; Agarwal MD; Brook A; Kharbanda V; Dialani V
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):923-929. PubMed ID: 30293819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined application of pharamcokinetic DCE-MRI and IVIM-DWI could improve detection efficiency in early diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Tao WJ; Zhang HX; Zhang LM; Gao F; Huang W; Liu Y; Zhu Y; Bai GJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):142-150. PubMed ID: 31124276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.