These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31907563)

  • 1. Multi-environment analysis of sorghum breeding trials using additive and dominance genomic relationships.
    Hunt CH; Hayes BJ; van Eeuwijk FA; Mace ES; Jordan DR
    Theor Appl Genet; 2020 Mar; 133(3):1009-1018. PubMed ID: 31907563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving accuracies of genomic predictions for drought tolerance in maize by joint modeling of additive and dominance effects in multi-environment trials.
    Dias KODG; Gezan SA; Guimarães CT; Nazarian A; da Costa E Silva L; Parentoni SN; de Oliveira Guimarães PE; de Oliveira Anoni C; Pádua JMV; de Oliveira Pinto M; Noda RW; Ribeiro CAG; de Magalhães JV; Garcia AAF; de Souza JC; Guimarães LJM; Pastina MM
    Heredity (Edinb); 2018 Jul; 121(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 29472694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality: an example in sorghum.
    Velazco JG; Malosetti M; Hunt CH; Mace ES; Jordan DR; van Eeuwijk FA
    Theor Appl Genet; 2019 Jul; 132(7):2055-2067. PubMed ID: 30968160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
    Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of prediction from multi-environment trials for new locations using pedigree information and environmental covariates: the case of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) breeding.
    Tadese D; Piepho HP; Hartung J
    Theor Appl Genet; 2024 Jul; 137(8):181. PubMed ID: 38985188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic prediction of hybrid performance for agronomic traits in sorghum.
    Sapkota S; Boatwright JL; Kumar N; Myers M; Cox A; Ackerman A; Caughman W; Brenton ZW; Boyles RE; Kresovich S
    G3 (Bethesda); 2023 Apr; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 36454599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic analysis of dominance effects on milk production and conformation traits in Fleckvieh cattle.
    Ertl J; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Edel C; Emmerling R; Götz KU
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):40. PubMed ID: 24962065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic studies with preselected markers reveal dominance effects influencing growth traits in Eucalyptus nitens.
    Thumma BR; Joyce KR; Jacobs A
    G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 34791210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic Studies Reveal Substantial Dominant Effects and Improved Genomic Predictions in an Open-Pollinated Breeding Population of
    Thavamanikumar S; Arnold RJ; Luo J; Thumma BR
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Oct; 10(10):3751-3763. PubMed ID: 32788286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of nonadditive effects in yearling weight of tropical beef cattle.
    Raidan FSS; Porto-Neto LR; Li Y; Lehnert SA; Vitezica ZG; Reverter A
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4028-4034. PubMed ID: 30032181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic Model with Correlation Between Additive and Dominance Effects.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
    Genetics; 2018 Jul; 209(3):711-723. PubMed ID: 29743175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
    Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic relationships reveal significant dominance effects for growth in hybrid Eucalyptus.
    Tan B; Grattapaglia D; Wu HX; Ingvarsson PK
    Plant Sci; 2018 Feb; 267():84-93. PubMed ID: 29362102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing combining abilities, genomic data, and genotype × environment interactions to predict hybrid grain sorghum performance.
    Fonseca JMO; Klein PE; Crossa J; Pacheco A; Perez-Rodriguez P; Ramasamy P; Klein R; Rooney WL
    Plant Genome; 2021 Nov; 14(3):e20127. PubMed ID: 34370387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
    Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Ostersen T; Henryon M; Lund MS
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45293. PubMed ID: 23028912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mixed model methods for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects using SNP markers.
    Da Y; Wang C; Wang S; Hu G
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87666. PubMed ID: 24498162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic heritability estimates in sweet cherry reveal non-additive genetic variance is relevant for industry-prioritized traits.
    Piaskowski J; Hardner C; Cai L; Zhao Y; Iezzoni A; Peace C
    BMC Genet; 2018 Apr; 19(1):23. PubMed ID: 29636022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.
    Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction accuracies and genetic parameters for test-day traits from genomic and pedigree-based random regression models with or without heat stress interactions.
    Bohlouli M; Alijani S; Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):488-502. PubMed ID: 30343923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.