These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31907852)

  • 1. Distraction biases working memory for faces.
    Mallett R; Mummaneni A; Lewis-Peacock JA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):350-356. PubMed ID: 31907852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Memory across a short-delay: Systematic biases in memory for faces.
    Jun J; Tan DH; Remington RW; Jiang YV
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Apr; 195():39-49. PubMed ID: 30878000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Focus of Spatial Attention Determines the Number and Precision of Face Representations in Working Memory.
    Towler J; Kelly M; Eimer M
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Jun; 26(6):2530-40. PubMed ID: 25903465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The persistence of distraction: a study of attentional biases by fear, faces, and context.
    Parks EL; Kim SY; Hopfinger JB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1501-8. PubMed ID: 24696390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flexible Coding of Visual Working Memory Representations during Distraction.
    Lorenc ES; Sreenivasan KK; Nee DE; Vandenbroucke ARE; D'Esposito M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 38(23):5267-5276. PubMed ID: 29739867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory.
    Koshino H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():19-25. PubMed ID: 27838400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bend but don't break: Prioritization protects working memory from displacement but leaves it vulnerable to distortion from distraction.
    Zhang Z; Lewis-Peacock JA
    Cognition; 2023 Oct; 239():105574. PubMed ID: 37541028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low cognitive load strengthens distractor interference while high load attenuates when cognitive load and distractor possess similar visual characteristics.
    Minamoto T; Shipstead Z; Osaka N; Engle RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1659-73. PubMed ID: 25813738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Working memory load and distraction: dissociable effects of visual maintenance and cognitive control.
    Konstantinou N; Beal E; King JR; Lavie N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):1985-97. PubMed ID: 25085738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Similarity effects in visual working memory.
    Jiang YV; Lee HJ; Asaad A; Remington R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):476-82. PubMed ID: 26202703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prioritization sharpens working memories but does not protect them from distraction.
    Zhang Z; Lewis-Peacock JA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Apr; 152(4):1158-1174. PubMed ID: 36395057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of working memory in visual selective attention.
    de Fockert JW; Rees G; Frith CD; Lavie N
    Science; 2001 Mar; 291(5509):1803-6. PubMed ID: 11230699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.
    Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of alpha oscillations in distractor inhibition during memory retention.
    Schroeder SCY; Ball F; Busch NA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 48(7):2516-2526. PubMed ID: 29381823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Opposing effects of perceptual versus working memory load on emotional distraction.
    Tavares TP; Logie K; Mitchell DG
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2945-56. PubMed ID: 27329606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Memory facilitation for emotional faces: Visual working memory trade-offs resulting from attentional preference for emotional facial expressions.
    Lee HJ; Cho YS
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1231-1243. PubMed ID: 30977105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Type 1 diabetes and working memory processing of emotional faces.
    González-Garrido AA; Gallardo-Moreno GB; Gómez-Velázquez FR
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 May; 363():173-181. PubMed ID: 30738100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distractor-resistant Short-Term Memory Is Supported by Transient Changes in Neural Stimulus Representations.
    Derrfuss J; Ekman M; Hanke M; Tittgemeyer M; Fiebach CJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Sep; 29(9):1547-1565. PubMed ID: 28430039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.