These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31907975)

  • 1. Probability Size Matters: The Effect of Foreground-Only versus Foreground+Background Graphs on Risk Aversion Diminishes with Larger Probabilities.
    Okan Y; Stone ER; Parillo J; Bruine de Bruin W; Parker AM
    Risk Anal; 2020 Apr; 40(4):771-788. PubMed ID: 31907975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Designing Graphs that Promote Both Risk Understanding and Behavior Change.
    Okan Y; Stone ER; Bruine de Bruin W
    Risk Anal; 2018 May; 38(5):929-946. PubMed ID: 28973820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Numerical Versus Foreground-Only Icon Displays on Understanding of Risk Magnitudes.
    Stone ER; Gabard AR; Groves AE; Lipkus IM
    J Health Commun; 2015; 20(10):1230-41. PubMed ID: 26065633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Designing Graphs to Communicate Risks: Understanding How the Choice of Graphical Format Influences Decision Making.
    Stone ER; Bruine de Bruin W; Wilkins AM; Boker EM; MacDonald Gibson J
    Risk Anal; 2017 Apr; 37(4):612-628. PubMed ID: 27862121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.
    Filges T; Sonne-Schmidt CS; Nielsen BCV
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-107. PubMed ID: 37131395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of cognitive load on decision making with graphically displayed uncertainty information.
    Allen PM; Edwards JA; Snyder FJ; Makinson KA; Hamby DM
    Risk Anal; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1495-505. PubMed ID: 24354944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinct neuropsychological processes may mediate decision-making under uncertainty with known and unknown probability in gain and loss frames.
    Inukai K; Takahashi T
    Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 16574332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions.
    Akl EA; Oxman AD; Herrin J; Vist GE; Terrenato I; Sperati F; Costiniuk C; Blank D; Schünemann H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Mar; 2011(3):CD006776. PubMed ID: 21412897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.
    Reyna VF; Farley F
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2006 Sep; 7(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 26158695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing aversion to side effects in preventive medical treatment decisions.
    Waters EA; Weinstein ND; Colditz GA; Emmons KM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2007 Mar; 13(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 17385998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature.
    Visschers VH; Meertens RM; Passchier WW; de Vries NN
    Risk Anal; 2009 Feb; 29(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 19000070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are People Interested in Probabilities of Natural Disasters?
    Michailova J; Tyszka T; Pfeifer K
    Risk Anal; 2017 May; 37(5):1005-1017. PubMed ID: 27554078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.
    Mugellini G; Della Bella S; Colagrossi M; Isenring GL; Killias M
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2021 Jun; 17(2):e1173. PubMed ID: 37131927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice.
    Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR
    Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dopamine Modulates Dynamic Decision-Making during Foraging.
    Le Heron C; Kolling N; Plant O; Kienast A; Janska R; Ang YS; Fallon S; Husain M; Apps MAJ
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jul; 40(27):5273-5282. PubMed ID: 32457071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Object detectability at increased ambient lighting conditions.
    Pollard BJ; Chawla AS; Delong DM; Hashimoto N; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2204-13. PubMed ID: 18649449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Sudharsanan N; Favaretti C; Hachaturyan V; Bärnighausen T; Vandormael A
    Trials; 2021 Sep; 22(1):592. PubMed ID: 34488843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The visual communication of risk.
    Lipkus IM; Hollands JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1999; (25):149-63. PubMed ID: 10854471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.