These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31909001)

  • 1. Anesthetic Efficacy of Single Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine and 2% Lignocaine in Extraction of Maxillary 1
    Kumar DP; Sharma M; Patil V; Subedar RS; Lakshmi GV; Manjunath NV
    Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2019; 9(2):239-246. PubMed ID: 31909001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery.
    Phyo HE; Chaiyasamut T; Kiattavorncharoen S; Pairuchvej V; Bhattarai BP; Wongsirichat N
    J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2020 Aug; 20(4):203-212. PubMed ID: 32934986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine Single Buccal Infiltration versus Conventional Buccal and Palatal Injection Using Lidocaine during Primary Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized Control Trial.
    Kolli NK; Nirmala SV; Nuvvula S
    Anesth Essays Res; 2017; 11(1):160-164. PubMed ID: 28298777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy of 4% Articaine, 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lignocaine using a Single Buccal Supraperiosteal Injection for Maxillary Tooth Extraction.
    Chandrasekaran D; Chinnaswami R; Shanthi K; Dhiravia Sargunam AE; Kumar KS; Satheesh T
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S721-S724. PubMed ID: 34447189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Majid OW; Ahmed AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 76(4):737-743. PubMed ID: 29257943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extraction of permanent maxillary teeth by only buccal infiltration of articaine.
    Somuri AV; Rai AB; Pillai M
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2013 Jun; 12(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 24431829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine with Buccal and Palatal Infiltration of 2% Lignocaine for the Extraction of Maxillary Premolar Teeth.
    Sandilya V; Andrade NN; Mathai PC; Aggarwal N; Sahu V; Nerurkar S
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2019; 10(2):284-288. PubMed ID: 32308291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of articaine and lignocaine for uncomplicated maxillary exodontia.
    Luqman U; Majeed Janjua OS; Ashfaq M; Irfan H; Mushtaq S; Bilal A
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 25772957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of 4% articaine hydrochloride and 2% lignocaine hydrochloride in the extraction of maxillary premolars for orthodontic reasons.
    Hassan S; Rao BH; Sequeria J; Rai G
    Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 1(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 23482319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lignocaine in achieving palatal anesthesia following a single buccal infiltration during periodontal therapy: A randomized double-blind split-mouth study.
    Ashwath B; Subramoniam S; Vijayalakshmi R; Shanmugam M; Priya BM; Anitha V
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2018; 34(1):107-110. PubMed ID: 29643633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of Articaine vs Lignocaine for infiltration anaesthesia during primary molar extractions.
    Chen S; Xiang J; Ji Y
    Pak J Med Sci; 2022; 38(4Part-II):1048-1055. PubMed ID: 35634630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Split-Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lignocaine for Maxillary Bicuspids Extraction.
    Jaiswal P; Goyal R; Dubey C; Akhter J; Ramalingam K; Kalita S
    Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e40167. PubMed ID: 37431340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Efficacy of 4% Articaine Versus 2% Lidocaine in Inducing Palatal Anesthesia for Tooth Extraction in Different Maxillary Regions.
    Gholami M; Banihashemrad A; Mohammadzadeh A; Ahrari F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Aug; 79(8):1643-1649. PubMed ID: 33757745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A clinical study of efficacy of 4% articaine hydrochloride versus 2% lignocaine hydrochloride in dentistry.
    Darawade DA; Kumar S; Budhiraja S; Mittal M; Mehta TN
    J Int Oral Health; 2014 Sep; 6(5):81-3. PubMed ID: 25395799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the Efficacy Between Articaine and Lignocaine in Simultaneous Bilateral Orthodontic Maxillary Premolar Extractions: A Split-Mouth Comparative Study.
    Krishna S; Bhaskaran R; Kumar SP; Krishnan M
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50078. PubMed ID: 38192927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine During Primary Maxillary Molar Extractions in Children.
    Mittal M; Sharma S; Kumar A; Chopra R; Srivastava D
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 26883609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the Pain Reaction of Children and Evaluation of Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration with Articaine and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block with Lignocaine for Pulp Therapy in Primary Mandibular Second Molars.
    Daneswari V; Venugopal Reddy N; Madhavi G; Pranathi P
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(3):335-339. PubMed ID: 34720502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study.
    Dhake P; Nagpal D; Chaudhari P; Lamba G; Hotwani K; Singh P
    J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2022 Oct; 22(5):387-394. PubMed ID: 36246033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can single buccal infiltration with 4% articaine induce sufficient analgesia for the extraction of primary molars in children: a systematic literature review.
    Tirupathi SP; Rajasekhar S
    J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2020 Aug; 20(4):179-186. PubMed ID: 32934983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.
    Fan S; Chen WL; Yang ZH; Huang ZQ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 18996033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.