These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31909465)

  • 1. Changes and analysis of transvaginal forceps delivery rate in primary hospitals in the past 10 years.
    Qiufeng L; Jie X; Xiahong W; Lixin Y
    Ginekol Pol; 2019; 90(12):711-716. PubMed ID: 31909465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rotational forceps versus manual rotation and direct forceps: A retrospective cohort study.
    O'Brien S; Day F; Lenguerrand E; Cornthwaite K; Edwards S; Siassakos D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 May; 212():119-125. PubMed ID: 28351816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choosing between bad, worse and worst: what is the preferred mode of delivery for failure of the second stage of labor?
    Hendler I; Kirshenbaum M; Barg M; Kees S; Mazaki-Tovi S; Moran O; Kalter A; Schiff E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Aug; 30(15):1861-1864. PubMed ID: 27550831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rotational delivery with Kielland's forceps.
    Chow SL; Johnson CM; Anderson TD; Hughes JH
    Med J Aust; 1987 Jun; 146(12):616-9. PubMed ID: 3626909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women].
    Ding X; Aimainilezi A; Jin Y; Abudula W; Yin C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 25537243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should we allow a trial of labor after a previous cesarean for dystocia in the second stage of labor?
    Bujold E; Gauthier RJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 98(4):652-5. PubMed ID: 11576583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlative analysis of different treatments of persistent occipitotransverse position on the outcome for mother and infant.
    Lin C; Zhou J; Mao S; Tang J; Qiu G; Zheng Z; Wang L; Lin J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 Aug; 50(8):1302-1308. PubMed ID: 38769797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour.
    Tempest N; Hart A; Walkinshaw S; Hapangama DK
    BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1277-84. PubMed ID: 23906197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station.
    Muraca GM; Sabr Y; Lisonkova S; Skoll A; Brant R; Cundiff GW; Joseph KS
    CMAJ; 2017 Jun; 189(22):E764-E772. PubMed ID: 28584040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forceps delivery for non-rotational and rotational operative vaginal delivery.
    Black M; Murphy DJ
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Apr; 56():55-68. PubMed ID: 30827815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of Perinatal Outcome of Forceps Delivery and Risk Factors of Postpartum Hemorrhage.
    Feng J; Zhang X
    Altern Ther Health Med; 2024 Apr; 30(4):102-107. PubMed ID: 38064601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with forceps delivery versus cesarean delivery.
    Liu X; Landon MB; Cheng W; Chen Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jan; 33(2):307-313. PubMed ID: 29909749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound.
    Dall'Asta A; Angeli L; Masturzo B; Volpe N; Schera GBL; Di Pasquo E; Girlando F; Attini R; Menato G; Frusca T; Ghi T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):642.e1-642.e13. PubMed ID: 31589867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound in labor and delivery.
    Molina FS; Nicolaides KH
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2010; 27(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 20173318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vacuum assisted delivery in Ecuador for prolonged second stage of labor: maternal-neonatal outcome.
    Chang X; Chedraui P; Ross MG; Hidalgo L; Peñafiel J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 May; 20(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 17674241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. OCCIPUT POSTERIOR POSITION.
    CHEN HY; WEI PY
    Tsa Chih Gaoxiong Yi Xue Yuan Tong Xue Hui; 1962 Nov; 61():1047-60. PubMed ID: 14065277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.
    Benavides L; Wu JM; Hundley AF; Ivester TS; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1702-6. PubMed ID: 15902181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Indications and technic of operative vaginal delivery in vertex presentation].
    Gitsch E; Reinold E
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1984; 106(10):653-9. PubMed ID: 6485615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
    Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.