BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31909678)

  • 1. Effect of Different Implant-Abutment Connection Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Abutments.
    AlAmar M; Alqahtani F
    J Oral Implantol; 2020 Apr; 46(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 31909678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
    Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In Vitro Comparison of Modes of Failures among Titanium and One- and Two-piece Zirconia Abutment under Static Load.
    Alqahtani F; AlAmar M
    Eur J Dent; 2020 Feb; 14(1):157-160. PubMed ID: 32168542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.
    Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of zirconia-based implant abutments after artificial long-term aging.
    Alsahhaf A; Spies BC; Vach K; Kohal RJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Feb; 66():224-232. PubMed ID: 27915156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.
    Sailer I; Asgeirsson AG; Thoma DS; Fehmer V; Aspelund T; Özcan M; Pjetursson BE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 29527740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.
    Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Leutert CR; Sailer TR; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 21443610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant/abutment systems for anterior application.
    Rosentritt M; Hagemann A; Hahnel S; Behr M; Preis V
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 24699071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture strength study of internally connected zirconia abutments reinforced with titanium inserts.
    Chun HJ; Yeo IS; Lee JH; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Han JS; Lee SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(2):346-50. PubMed ID: 25830395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Load to failure of different zirconia abutments for an internal hexagon implant.
    Yilmaz B; Salaita LG; Seidt JD; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 25976709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro performance of two-piece zirconia implant systems for anterior application.
    Preis V; Kammermeier A; Handel G; Rosentritt M
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jun; 32(6):765-74. PubMed ID: 27068740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of Screw Channel Angulation on the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Abutments: An In Vitro Study.
    Garcia-Hammaker S; Saglik B; Sierraalta M; Razzoog M
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(4):329-334. PubMed ID: 33170540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Zirconia and Titanium Abutments with Different Diameters.
    Shabanpour R; Mousavi N; Ghodsi S; Alikhasi M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Aug; 16(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 26423495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
    Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.
    Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro fatigue and fracture strength testing of one-piece zirconia implant abutments and zirconia implant abutments connected to titanium cores.
    Stimmelmayr M; Sagerer S; Erdelt K; Beuer F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):488-93. PubMed ID: 23527351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical stability of all-ceramic abutments retained with three different screw materials in two-piece zirconia implants-an in vitro study.
    Stimmelmayr M; Lang A; Beuer F; Mansour S; Erdelt K; Krennmair G; Güth JF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 May; 24(5):1801-1806. PubMed ID: 31478098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of the Titanium Base Abutment Design on Monolithic Zirconia Multiple-Unit Implant Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Laboratory Study.
    Calderon U; Hicklin SP; Mojon P; Fehmer V; Nesic D; Mekki M; Sailer I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 35235616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.