These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
28. An in vitro comparison of fracture load of zirconia custom abutments with internal connection and different angulations and thickness: part I. Albosefi A; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 24417713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fracture resistance of inter-joined zirconia abutment of dental implant system with injection molding technique. Yang J; Wang K; Liu G; Wang D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1247-50. PubMed ID: 22809060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An In Vitro Comparison of Fracture Load of Zirconia Custom Abutments with Internal Connection and Different Angulations and Thicknesses: Part II. Zandparsa R; Albosefi A J Prosthodont; 2016 Feb; 25(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 25865430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Coray R; Zeltner M; Özcan M J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Sep; 62():333-346. PubMed ID: 27239815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems. Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fatigue fracture resistance of titanium and chairside CAD-CAM zirconia implant abutments supporting zirconia crowns: An in vitro comparative and finite element analysis study. Giner S; Bartolomé JF; Gomez-Cogolludo P; Castellote C; Pradíes G J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):503.e1-503.e9. PubMed ID: 33243472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mechanical Stability of Restorations Supported by Titanium Base, Zirconia, and Polyetherketoneketone Abutments on One- and Two-Piece Zirconia Implants. Cantarella J; Pitta J; Mojon P; Hicklin SP; Fehmer V; Sailer I Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):313-321. PubMed ID: 33909721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mechanical stability of angulated zirconia abutments supporting maxillary anterior single crowns on narrow-diameter implants. Ma R; Yu P; Zhang Y; Xie C; Tan X; Sun J; Yu H Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):221-233. PubMed ID: 36161530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study. Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Happe A; Beuer F Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1215-20. PubMed ID: 23021964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations. Sghaireen MG Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of Abutment Preparation and Fatigue Loading in a Moist Environment on the Fracture Resistance of the One-Piece Zirconia Dental Implant. Kamel M; Vaidyanathan TK; Flinton R Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(3):533-540. PubMed ID: 28494037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments. Akan E; Velioğlu E; Çömlekoğlu ME; Çömlekoğlu MD Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]