These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Evaluating a new technology: the effectiveness of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring. Shy KK; Larson EB; Luthy DA Annu Rev Public Health; 1987; 8():165-90. PubMed ID: 3555520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Development of a Smart Mobile Data Module for Fetal Monitoring in E-Healthcare. Houzé de l'Aulnoit A; Boudet S; Génin M; Gautier PF; Schiro J; Houzé de l'Aulnoit D; Beuscart R J Med Syst; 2018 Mar; 42(5):83. PubMed ID: 29572752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Domiciliary midwifery support in high-risk pregnancy incorporating telephonic fetal heart rate monitoring: a health technology randomized assessment. Dawson A; Cohen D; Candelier C; Jones G; Sanders J; Thompson A; Arnall C; Coles E J Telemed Telecare; 1999; 5(4):220-30. PubMed ID: 10829372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Phone transmission of fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings in a rural setting. Giacoia GP; D'angelo LJ; Cash J; Gray J J Okla State Med Assoc; 1987 Jan; 80(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 3819900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Feasibility of in utero telemetric fetal ECG monitoring in a lamb model. Hermans B; Lewi L; Jani J; De Buck F; Deprest J; Puers R Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 24(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 18648203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Women's experience of wearing a portable fetal-electrocardiogram device to monitor small-for-gestational age fetus in their home environment. Kapaya H; Dimelow ER; Anumba D Womens Health (Lond); 2018; 14():1745506518785620. PubMed ID: 29968515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Importance of fetal cardiac rhythm monitoring at home in the follow-up of pregnancies at risk: evaluation following 2 years of utilization]. Barbarino-Monnier P; Prato E; Thoumsin H; Lambotte R Rev Med Liege; 1992 Sep; 47(9):461-9. PubMed ID: 1410975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Detection and management of decreased fetal movements in Ireland: a national survey of midwives' and obstetricians' practices. Smith V; Begley C; Devane D Midwifery; 2014 Jan; 30(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 23522665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Maternal cardiac autonomic function and fetal heart rate in preeclamptic compared to normotensive pregnancies. Swansburg ML; Brown CA; Hains SM; Smith GN; Kisilevsky BS Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2005; 15(3):42-52. PubMed ID: 16295797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Fetal home telemonitoring: the Nancy experience from 1992-1997. analysis of 12649 recordings]. Quemere MP; Boutroy JL; Fresson J; Abel F; Barbarino-Monnier P J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Oct; 29(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 11084464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The significance of autocorrelation in fetal monitoring. Horton R Midwives Chron; 1991 Sep; 104(1244):260-1. PubMed ID: 1921767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The need for a new outlook on labor monitoring. Farine D; Shenhav M; Barnea O; Jaffa A; Fox HE J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 16690509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Centralized fetal monitoring with telecommunication. Hara K; Fujimoto Y; Yanagihara T; Jimbo T Front Med Biol Eng; 1991; 3(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 1799563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Fetal monitoring with a combination transducer for FHR and uterine contraction--production of the transducer]. Maeda K; Nagata N Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jan; 41(1):91-2. PubMed ID: 2926198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of Corometrics 315 telemetry system for fetal monitoring. Lipshitz J; Wade JE; Anderson GD; Sibai BM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jan; 139(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 7457535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]