254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31911215)
1. Short-term evaluation of humeral stress shielding following reverse shoulder arthroplasty using press-fit fixation compared with cemented fixation.
Denard PJ; Haidamous G; Gobezie R; Romeo AA; Lederman E
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 May; 29(5):906-912. PubMed ID: 31911215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Press-fit vs. cemented humeral stem fixation for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 9.5 years.
Mazaleyrat M; Favard L; Garaud P; Boileau P; Berhouet J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jan; 30(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 32838951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proximal stress shielding is decreased with a short stem compared with a traditional-length stem in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Denard PJ; Noyes MP; Walker JB; Shishani Y; Gobezie R; Romeo AA; Lederman E
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jan; 27(1):53-58. PubMed ID: 28865965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of cemented versus press-fit primary humeral stem fixation in the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty.
Salesky MA; Grace TR; Feeley BT; Ma CB; Zhang AL
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 May; 27(5):801-807. PubMed ID: 29548544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiographic changes and clinical outcomes associated with an adjustable diaphyseal press-fit humeral stem in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Harmsen SM; Norris TR
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Sep; 26(9):1589-1597. PubMed ID: 28395945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cemented humeral stem
Uy M; Wang J; Horner NS; Bedi A; Leroux T; Alolabi B; Khan M
Bone Joint J; 2019 Sep; 101-B(9):1107-1114. PubMed ID: 31474140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Humeral stem with low filling ratio reduces stress shielding in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Kim SC; Park JH; Bukhary H; Yoo JC
Int Orthop; 2022 Jun; 46(6):1341-1349. PubMed ID: 35353240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are short press-fit stems comparable to standard-length cemented stems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Van de Kleut ML; Yuan X; Athwal GS; Teeter MG
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Mar; 31(3):580-590. PubMed ID: 34968694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiographic outcomes of impaction-grafted standard-length humeral components in total shoulder and ream-and-run arthroplasty: is stress shielding an issue?
Denard PJ; Hsu JE; Whitson A; Neradilek MB; Matsen FA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Nov; 28(11):2181-2190. PubMed ID: 31272887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value comparison of humeral component press-fit and cemented techniques in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Berglund DD; Mijic D; Law TY; Kurowicki J; Rosas S; Levy JC
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Mar; 28(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 30392933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic evaluation of short-stem press-fit total shoulder arthroplasty: short-term follow-up.
Casagrande DJ; Parks DL; Torngren T; Schrumpf MA; Harmsen SM; Norris TR; Kelly JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1163-9. PubMed ID: 26897311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.
Levy JC; Berglund D; Vakharia R; DeVito P; Tahal DS; Mijc D; Ameri B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Sep; 477(9):2097-2108. PubMed ID: 31107323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiographic changes around humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty.
Raiss P; Edwards TB; Deutsch A; Shah A; Bruckner T; Loew M; Boileau P; Walch G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Apr; 96(7):e54. PubMed ID: 24695931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Humeral osteolysis after reverse shoulder arthroplasty using cemented or cementless stems comparative retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 9 years.
Mazaleyrat M; Favard L; Boileau P; Berhouet J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Jun; 107(4):102916. PubMed ID: 33812096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing humeral stem fixation in revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the cement-within-cement technique.
Gorman RA; Christmas KN; Simon P; Hess AV; Brewley EE; Mighell MA; Frankle MA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7S):S9-S16. PubMed ID: 32360178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiographic changes differ between two different short press-fit humeral stem designs in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Denard PJ; Noyes MP; Walker JB; Shishani Y; Gobezie R; Romeo AA; Lederman E
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Feb; 27(2):217-223. PubMed ID: 28965688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and radiographic outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty with an anatomic press-fit short stem.
Szerlip BW; Morris BJ; Laughlin MS; Kilian CM; Edwards TB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jan; 27(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 29032988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress shielding of the humerus in press-fit anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: review and recommendations for evaluation.
Denard PJ; Raiss P; Gobezie R; Edwards TB; Lederman E
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1139-1147. PubMed ID: 29422391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture in the elderly. Cemented or uncemented stem?
Lopiz Y; García-Fernandez C; Vallejo-Carrasco M; Garriguez-Pérez D; Achaerandio L; Tesoro-Gonzalo C; Marco F
Int Orthop; 2022 Mar; 46(3):635-644. PubMed ID: 35034145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The incidence of radiographic aseptic loosening of the humeral component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Gilot G; Alvarez-Pinzon AM; Wright TW; Flurin PH; Krill M; Routman HD; Zuckerman JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Oct; 24(10):1555-9. PubMed ID: 25958209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
