These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31911693)

  • 1. What CRISPR-baby prison sentences mean for research.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2020 Jan; 577(7789):154-155. PubMed ID: 31911693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What to Expect When Expecting CRISPR Baby Number Four.
    Scott CT; Selin C
    Am J Bioeth; 2019 Mar; 19(3):7-9. PubMed ID: 30896351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genome-edited baby claim provokes international outcry.
    Cyranoski D; Ledford H
    Nature; 2018 Nov; 563(7733):607-608. PubMed ID: 30482929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rogues and Regulation of Germline Editing.
    Charo RA
    N Engl J Med; 2019 Mar; 380(10):976-980. PubMed ID: 30650001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The long shadow of a CRISPR scandal.
    Cohen J
    Science; 2019 Aug; 365(6452):436. PubMed ID: 31371594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Questioning the proposed translational pathway for germline genome editing.
    Baylis F
    Nat Hum Behav; 2019 Mar; 3(3):200. PubMed ID: 30953019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Momentous CRISPR-enabled developments.
    Nat Biomed Eng; 2019 Feb; 3(2):79-80. PubMed ID: 30944438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The morality and ethics governing CRISPR-Cas9 patents in China.
    Peng Y
    Nat Biotechnol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):616-8. PubMed ID: 27281418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inside the circle of trust.
    Cohen J
    Science; 2019 Aug; 365(6452):430-437. PubMed ID: 31371593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to respond to CRISPR babies.
    Nature; 2018 Dec; 564(7734):5. PubMed ID: 31481729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Crispr-Cas9 Gene Editing Revolution and the Its Ethical and Legal Challenges].
    Bellver Capella V
    Cuad Bioet; 2016; 27(90):223-39. PubMed ID: 27637196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gene editing: who should decide?
    Akabayashi A; Nakazawa E; Caplan AL
    Nature; 2018 Dec; 564(7735):190. PubMed ID: 30542172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Crossing the line.
    Cohen J
    Science; 2019 Nov; 366(6465):562-565. PubMed ID: 31672876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Crispr Future for Gene-Editing Regulation: a Proposal for an Updated Biotechnology Regulatory System in an Era of Human Genomic Editing.
    Tomlinson T
    Fordham Law Rev; 2018 Oct; 87(1):437-83. PubMed ID: 30296034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The better edge of the CRISPR blade.
    The Lancet
    Lancet; 2020 Jan; 395(10218):90. PubMed ID: 31929016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comments on the CRISPR Gene-edited babies' case.
    Cong Y
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2019; 4 (NS)(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 31791938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CRISPR and the Law: A South African Perspective.
    Soni S
    CRISPR J; 2020 Apr; 3(2):81-82. PubMed ID: 32315223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Creator of first gene edited babies faces "stern" punishment.
    Dyer O
    BMJ; 2019 Jan; 364():l346. PubMed ID: 30670454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Germline editing: could ban encourage medical tourism?
    Adashi EY; Cohen IG
    Nature; 2019 May; 569(7754):40. PubMed ID: 31040417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The CRISPR-baby scandal: what's next for human gene-editing.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2019 Feb; 566(7745):440-442. PubMed ID: 30809070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.