178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31911821)
1. Inter- and intraobserver agreement of three classification systems for lateral clavicle fractures - reliability comparison between two specialist groups.
Rauer T; Boos M; Neuhaus V; Ellanti P; Kaufmann RA; Pape HC; Allemann F
Patient Saf Surg; 2020; 14():4. PubMed ID: 31911821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Interobserver Agreement of Four Classification Systems for Lateral Clavicle Fractures between Two Groups of Surgeons: A Multicenter Study.
Lin J; Sun WJ; Chen JH; Dong JM; Bao DS; Yan L; Ni WD; Xiang M; Ding J; Cai M; Song JX; Mao MG; Wu XM
Orthop Surg; 2023 Aug; 15(8):2138-2143. PubMed ID: 36718055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
Marongiu G; Leinardi L; Congia S; Frigau L; Mola F; Capone A
J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Interrater and Intrarater Agreement of a Modified Neer Classification System and Associated Treatment Choice for Lateral Clavicle Fractures.
Cho CH; Oh JH; Jung GH; Moon GH; Rhyou IH; Yoon JP; Lee HM
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2431-6. PubMed ID: 26264768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Weber Ankle Fracture Classification System Yields Greatest Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability Over AO/OTA and Lauge-Hansen Classification Systems Under Time Constraints in an Asian Population.
Glen LZQ; Wong JYS; Tay WX; Li TP; Phua SKA; Manohara R; Chee YH
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2023; 62(3):505-510. PubMed ID: 36690511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intra- and interobserver agreement in the classification and treatment of distal third clavicle fractures.
Bishop JY; Jones GL; Lewis B; Pedroza A;
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Apr; 43(4):979-84. PubMed ID: 25587184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of Three-Dimensional CT Imaging on Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Proximal Humeral Fracture Classifications and Treatment Recommendations.
Berkes MB; Dines JS; Little MT; Garner MR; Shifflett GD; Lazaro LE; Wellman DS; Dines DM; Lorich DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Aug; 96(15):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 25100775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D-printed Handheld Models Do Not Improve Recognition of Specific Characteristics and Patterns of Three-part and Four-part Proximal Humerus Fractures.
Spek RWA; Schoolmeesters BJA; Oosterhoff JHF; Doornberg JN; van den Bekerom MPJ; Jaarsma RL; Eygendaal D; IJpma F;
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jan; 480(1):150-159. PubMed ID: 34427569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revising the modified Neer classification for distal clavicle fractures: Description and reliability.
Zhang Y; Yu P; Zhuang C; Liu J; Li G; Ye T; Wang L
Injury; 2023 Apr; 54 Suppl 2():S56-S62. PubMed ID: 34952695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
Lauder AJ; Inda DJ; Bott AM; Clare MP; Fitzgibbons TC; Mormino MA
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability assessment of tibial plateau fracture classification systems.
Taşkesen A; Demirkale İ; Okkaoğlu MC; Özdemir M; Bilgili MG; Altay M
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2017 Dec; 28(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 29125816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Periprosthetic humerus fractures after shoulder arthroplasty: an evaluation of available classification systems.
Kuhn MZ; King JJ; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Levy JC; Hao KA; Wallace A; Patrick M
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2034-2042. PubMed ID: 35562034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distal clavicle fractures: A new classification system.
Cho CH; Kim BS; Kim DH; Choi CH; Dan J; Lee H
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 104(8):1231-1235. PubMed ID: 30393071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Neer classification to the 2018 update of the Orthopedic Trauma Association/AO fracture classification for classifying proximal humerus fractures.
Marmor MT; Agel J; Dumpe J; Kellam JF; Marecek GS; Meinberg E; Nguyen MP; Sims S; Soles GL; Karam MD
OTA Int; 2022 Sep; 5(3):e200. PubMed ID: 36425090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in the classification and treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures.
Jones GL; Bishop JY; Lewis B; Pedroza AD;
Am J Sports Med; 2014 May; 42(5):1176-81. PubMed ID: 24573571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Evaluation of Femoral Head Fractures: Which Classification Systems Have the Best Universality, Reliability, and Reproducibility?
Wu S; Qian G; Huang Q; Dou B; Zheng Q; Wang W; Zhu X; Mei J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 482(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 37326487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and Reproducibility of the OTA/AO Classification for Humeral Shaft Fractures.
Mahabier KC; Van Lieshout EM; Van Der Schaaf BC; Roukema GR; Punt BJ; Verhofstad MH; Den Hartog D
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Mar; 31(3):e75-e80. PubMed ID: 27755334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Neer classification system for proximal humeral fractures. An assessment of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.
Sidor ML; Zuckerman JD; Lyon T; Koval K; Cuomo F; Schoenberg N
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1993 Dec; 75(12):1745-50. PubMed ID: 8258543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decision-making in the treatment of diaphyseal clavicle fractures: is there agreement among surgeons? Results of a survey on surgeons' treatment preferences.
Heuer HJ; Boykin RE; Petit CJ; Hardt J; Millett PJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Feb; 23(2):e23-33. PubMed ID: 23838065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of morphological Mutch classification for greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus: A comparison of x-ray, two-, and three-dimensional CT imaging.
Razaeian S; Askittou S; Wiese B; Zhang D; Harb A; Krettek C; Hawi N
PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259646. PubMed ID: 34762694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
