These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31912426)

  • 1. Is knowledge reliance in source guessing a cognitive trait? Examining stability across time and domain.
    Wulff L; Kuhlmann BG
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):256-276. PubMed ID: 31912426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of age stereotypes on source monitoring in younger and older adults.
    Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ; Meuser K; Kornadt AE
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Dec; 31(8):875-889. PubMed ID: 27831724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Guess what? Different source-guessing strategies for old versus new information.
    Wulff L; Bell R; Mieth L; Kuhlmann BG
    Memory; 2021 Mar; 29(3):416-426. PubMed ID: 33726623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):470-496. PubMed ID: 30024249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Source attributions for detected new items: Persistent evidence for schematic guessing.
    Bell R; Mieth L; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Sep; 73(9):1407-1422. PubMed ID: 32075493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hierarchical modeling of contingency-based source monitoring: a test of the probability-matching account.
    Arnold NR; Bayen UJ; Kuhlmann BG; Vaterrodt B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):326-33. PubMed ID: 23224987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in use of the recognition heuristic are stable across time, choice objects, domains, and presentation formats.
    Michalkiewicz M; Erdfelder E
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Apr; 44(3):454-68. PubMed ID: 26573057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How are stereotypes maintained through communication? The influence of stereotype sharedness.
    Lyons A; Kashima Y
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Dec; 85(6):989-1005. PubMed ID: 14674809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring.
    Bayen UJ; Nakamura GV; Dupuis SE; Yang CL
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):480-500. PubMed ID: 10881564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influences of Source - Item Contingency and Schematic Knowledge on Source Monitoring: Tests of the Probability-Matching Account.
    Bayen UJ; Kuhlmann BG
    J Mem Lang; 2011 Jan; 64(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 21603251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response bias in recognition memory as a cognitive trait.
    Kantner J; Lindsay DS
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Nov; 40(8):1163-77. PubMed ID: 22872581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictably confirmatory: The influence of stereotypes during decisional processing.
    Falbén JK; Tsamadi D; Golubickis M; Olivier JL; Persson LM; Cunningham WA; Macrae CN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2437-2451. PubMed ID: 30931799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Creative Stereotype Effect.
    Dumas D; Dunbar KN
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0142567. PubMed ID: 26863143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stereotype-based faultlines and out-group derogation in diverse teams: The moderating roles of task stereotypicality and need for cognition.
    Stanciu A; Vos MW
    J Soc Psychol; 2017; 157(3):352-365. PubMed ID: 27472245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When and how stereotype threat influences older adults' arithmetic performance: Insight from a strategy approach.
    Nicolas P; Lemaire P; Régner I
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Feb; 149(2):343-367. PubMed ID: 31328937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the contributions of task expectancy in the testing and guessing benefits on recognition memory.
    Huff MJ; Yates TJ; Balota DA
    Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1065-1083. PubMed ID: 29723114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informed guessing in change detection.
    Rhodes S; Cowan N; Hardman KO; Logie RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1023-1035. PubMed ID: 29265829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Positive stereotypes, negative outcomes: Reminders of the positive components of complementary gender stereotypes impair performance in counter-stereotypical tasks.
    Kahalon R; Shnabel N; Becker JC
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2018 Apr; 57(2):482-502. PubMed ID: 29377186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Schema bias in source monitoring varies with encoding conditions: support for a probability-matching account.
    Kuhlmann BG; Vaterrodt B; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1365-76. PubMed ID: 22545608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].
    Mackinnon A; Mulligan R
    Encephale; 2005; 31(1 Pt 1):31-43. PubMed ID: 15971638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.