These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31914282)

  • 1. [Research progress on the relationship between electrode position and electrode impedance of artificial cochlea].
    Huang JC; Chen P
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 33(12):1221-1224. PubMed ID: 31914282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrode migration after cochlear implantation.
    von Mitzlaff C; Dalbert A; Winklhofer S; Veraguth D; Huber A; Röösli C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 Mar; 22(2):103-110. PubMed ID: 33148136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Postoperative dynamics of electrode impedance changes in children with cochlear implants].
    Kechiyan DK; Bakhshinyan VV; Tavartkiladze GA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2020; 85(5):29-32. PubMed ID: 33140930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in the impedance of cochlear implant devices within 24 hours of their implantation.
    Lin DP; Chen JK; Tung TH; Li LP
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222711. PubMed ID: 31536550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Four-Point Impedance Changes After Cochlear Implantation for Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Implants.
    Razmovski T; Bester C; Collins A; Tan E; O'Leary SJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec; 43(10):e1107-e1114. PubMed ID: 36351225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impedance changes in chronically implanted and stimulated cochlear implant electrodes.
    Newbold C; Mergen S; Richardson R; Seligman P; Millard R; Cowan R; Shepherd R
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jul; 15(4):191-9. PubMed ID: 23998484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards inferring positioning of straight cochlear-implant electrode arrays during insertion using real-time impedance sensing.
    Riojas KE; Bruns TL; Granna J; Smetak MR; Labadie RF; Webster RJ
    Int J Med Robot; 2024 Feb; 20(1):e2609. PubMed ID: 38536718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraoperative Impedance-Based Estimation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion Depth.
    Aebischer P; Meyer S; Caversaccio M; Wimmer W
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Feb; 68(2):545-555. PubMed ID: 32746052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrical impedance guides electrode array in cochlear implantation using machine learning and robotic feeder.
    Hafeez N; Du X; Boulgouris N; Begg P; Irving R; Coulson C; Tourrel G
    Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 412():108371. PubMed ID: 34689069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of electrode impedance and its subcomponents for lateral wall, mid-scala, and perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implants.
    Saoji AA; Graham M; Stein A; Koka K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Mar; 23(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 34895078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The analysis of the electrode impedance in different periods after cochlear implantation performed with round window insertion in steroid deposition].
    Zhong KB; Wang XQ; Ge RM; Huang HM; Zeng J; Wu PN
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 31(13):988-990. PubMed ID: 29798159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrode migration after cochlear implant surgery: more common than expected?
    Dietz A; Wennström M; Lehtimäki A; Löppönen H; Valtonen H
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 273(6):1411-8. PubMed ID: 26164294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
    Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrode design and insertional depth-dependent intra-cochlear pressure changes: a model experiment.
    Mittmann P; Ernst A; Todt I
    J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Mar; 132(3):224-229. PubMed ID: 29103379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evidence-based guide for intraoperative cochlear implant backup use.
    Khater AM; Moustafa MF; Said A; Fahmy HS
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1500-4. PubMed ID: 26231744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn.
    van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; van der Marel KS; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 26891130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
    Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Impedance of cochlear implant electrode array in scalae tympani].
    Du Q; Wang ZM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(46):3302-4. PubMed ID: 19159560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear implantation in children with bacterial meningitic deafness: The influence of the degree of ossification and obliteration on impedance and charge of the implant.
    Durisin M; Büchner A; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Bartling S; Warnecke A; Lenarz T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 May; 16(3):147-58. PubMed ID: 25130272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic intracochlear pressure measurement during cochlear implant electrode insertion.
    Ordonez F; Riemann C; Mueller S; Sudhoff H; Todt I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 139(10):860-865. PubMed ID: 31298591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.