165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31914423)
21. Automatic Tube Current Modulation and Tube Voltage Selection in Pediatric Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study on Radiation Dose and Image Quality.
Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2019 May; 54(5):265-272. PubMed ID: 30562273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.
Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of a combined tube current modulation system on dose delivered to patients undergoing thoracic and abdominal CT with a 128-slice scanner.
Stratis A; Kottou S; Molfetas M; Xirafi I; Delis H; Panayiotakis G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 23173217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of image noise levels, scout scan dose and lens shield on image quality and radiation exposure in z-axis dose-modulated neck MSCT on 16- and 64-slice Toshiba Aquilion scanners.
Bauknecht HC; Jach C; Bohner G; Meyer H; Scheurig C; Siebert E; Klingebiel R
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):439-43. PubMed ID: 19135816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
Siegel MJ; Schmidt B; Bradley D; Suess C; Hildebolt C
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 15358847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Optimizing radiation exposure for CT localizer radiographs.
Bohrer E; Schäfer S; Mäder U; Noël PB; Krombach GA; Fiebich M
Z Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 27(2):145-158. PubMed ID: 27720574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The relationship between CT scout landmarks and lung boundaries on chest CT: guidelines for minimizing excess z-axis scan length.
Cohen SL; Ward TJ; Cham MD
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):581-587. PubMed ID: 31410602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reduced radiation exposure of the female breast during low-dose chest CT using organ-based tube current modulation and a bismuth shield: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Kim YK; Sung YM; Choi JH; Kim EY; Kim HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):537-44. PubMed ID: 23436842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. To shield or not to shield: shielding may have unintended effects on patient dose in CT.
Larjava HRS; Eneh CTM; Niiniviita HM
Eur Radiol; 2024 Apr; 34(4):2480-2486. PubMed ID: 37707547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Considerations on an automatic computed tomography tube current modulation system.
Moro L; Panizza D; D'Ambrosio D; Carne I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Oct; 156(4):525-30. PubMed ID: 23584497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Upper limits of the photon fluence rate on CT detectors: Case study on a commercial scanner.
Persson M; Bujila R; Nowik P; Andersson H; Kull L; Andersson J; Bornefalk H; Danielsson M
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4398. PubMed ID: 27370155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Technical Note: Phantom study to evaluate the dose and image quality effects of a computed tomography organ-based tube current modulation technique.
Gandhi D; Crotty DJ; Stevens GM; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6572-8. PubMed ID: 26520748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. SUBOPTIMAL MODULATION OF RADIATION DOSE IN THE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY COMPONENT OF WHOLE-BODY POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY/COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
Inoue Y; Adachi M; Shimizu H; Nagahara K; Itoh H; Takano M; Jinguji K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Dec; 192(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 33302289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Influence of maximum tube current threshold in automatic exposure control at 64-detector row CT: relationship between radiation dose reduction rate and variability of image noise].
Shirasaka T; Funama Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Mar; 65(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 19367062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. X-ray tube current modulation and patient doses in chest CT.
He W; Huda W; Magill D; Tavrides E; Yao H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jan; 143(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 21068019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Verdun FR; von Allmen G; Mini RL; Vock P
Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 18496042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The importance of spectral separation: an assessment of dual-energy spectral separation for quantitative ability and dose efficiency.
Krauss B; Grant KL; Schmidt BT; Flohr TG
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 25373305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Scout view X-ray attenuation versus weight-based selection of reduced peak tube voltage in cardiac CT angiography.
Ghafourian K; Younes D; Simprini LA; Weigold WG; Weissman G; Taylor AJ
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 5(6):589-95. PubMed ID: 22698527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Radiation dose reduction in chest CT--review of available options.
Kubo T; Ohno Y; Kauczor HU; Hatabu H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1953-61. PubMed ID: 25066756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
