These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31915525)

  • 21. [The role of information and training for workers on the correct use of earplugs in assessing real noise attenuation with E-A-RfitTM system].
    Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Germano C; Dentamaro A; Di Lorenzo L
    Med Lav; 2015 Jul; 106(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 26154471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Measurement of real personal noise attenuation using earplugs with the E-A-Rfit system].
    Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Scarselletta RS; Di Lorenzo L
    Med Lav; 2013; 104(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 23879065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing Protection Devices Based on Microphone in Real Ear.
    Biabani A; Aliabadi M; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
    Saf Health Work; 2017 Dec; 8(4):364-370. PubMed ID: 29276635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Longitudinal evaluation of a hearing protector fit training program.
    Assunção CHC; Trabanco JC; Gomes RF; Moreira RR; Samelli AG
    Med Lav; 2019 Aug; 110(4):304-311. PubMed ID: 31475692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Noise attenuation and proper insertion of earplugs into ear canals.
    Toivonen M; Pääkkönen R; Savolainen S; Lehtomäki K
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2002 Aug; 46(6):527-30. PubMed ID: 12176767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Noise attenuation of earplugs as measured by hREAT and F-MIRE methods in a Japanese metal manufacturing plant.
    Kabe I; Kochi T; Tsuruoka H; Tonegawa T; Denda I; Nonogi M; Tsuiki H; Mizoue T; Tanaka S
    J Occup Health; 2012; 54(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 22673642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using a boothless audiometer to estimate personal attenuation rating in a military hearing conservation clinic.
    Kulinski D; Brungart DS
    JASA Express Lett; 2022 Apr; 2(4):043601. PubMed ID: 36154227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Association between personal attenuation rating with types of earplugs and noise exposure levels in a textile factory in China.
    Fu S; Huang L; Zhong X; Su S; Li X; Huang Q; Xia B; Zhu J; Zhang M
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Oct; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 39387323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Efficiency of Hearing Protective Devices against Occupational Low Frequency Noise in Comparison to the New Subjective Suggested Method.
    Forouharmajd F; Nazaryan K; Fuente A; Pourabdian S; Asady H
    Int J Prev Med; 2022; 13():143. PubMed ID: 36618539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The objective measurement of individual earplug field performance.
    Voix J; Laville F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3722-32. PubMed ID: 19507954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the hearing protector in a real work situation using the field-microphone-in-real-ear method.
    Rocha CH; Longo IA; Moreira RR; Samelli AG
    Codas; 2016 Apr; 28(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 27191871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perception of hearing protectors by workers that participate in hearing preservation programs: a preliminary study.
    Gonçalves CG; Lüders D; Guirado DS; Albizu EJ; Marques JM
    Codas; 2015; 27(4):309-18. PubMed ID: 26398252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Individual fit testing of hearing protection devices.
    Voix J; Hager LD
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 19534854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A trail of individual education for hearing protection with an instrument that measures the noise attenuation effect of wearing earplugs.
    Tsukada T; Sakakibara H
    Ind Health; 2008 Aug; 46(4):393-6. PubMed ID: 18716388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interventions to prevent occupational noise induced hearing loss.
    Verbeek JH; Kateman E; Morata TC; Dreschler W; Sorgdrager B
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Jul; (3):CD006396. PubMed ID: 19588388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Training on hearing protector insertion improves noise attenuation.
    Samelli AG; Rocha CH; Theodósio P; Moreira RR; Neves-Lobo IF
    Codas; 2015; 27(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 26691614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A study of the real-world noise attenuation of the current hearing protection devices in typical workplaces using Field Microphone in Real Ear method.
    Aliabadi M; Biabani A; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
    Work; 2018; 60(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 29865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.