These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31915610)
21. Monitoring of typodont root movement via crown superimposition of single cone-beam computed tomography and consecutive intraoral scans. Lee RJ; Pham J; Choy M; Weissheimer A; Dougherty HL; Sameshima GT; Tong H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 24582031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by laboratory impression scan protocols. Peng L; Chen L; Harris BT; Bhandari B; Morton D; Lin WS J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 29703675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dimensional accuracy of digital dental models from cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions according to time elapsed after the impressions. Lee SM; Hou Y; Cho JH; Hwang HS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 26827986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: A comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing. Wesemann C; Muallah J; Mah J; Bumann A Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 27834416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mesiodistal tooth dimensions and anterior and overall Bolton ratios evaluated by cone beam computed tomography. Celikoglu M; Nur M; Kilkis D; Sezgin OS; Bayram M Aust Orthod J; 2013 Nov; 29(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 24380134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Fabrication and accuracy research on 3D printing dental model based on cone beam computed tomography digital modeling]. Zhang HR; Yin LF; Liu YL; Yan LY; Wang N; Liu G; An XL; Liu B Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 36(2):156-161. PubMed ID: 29779276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Suitability and accuracy of CBCT model scan: an in vitro study. Robben J; Muallah J; Wesemann C; Nowak R; Mah J; Pospiech P; Bumann A Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(4):363-375. PubMed ID: 29292411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans. Al-Rawi B; Hassan B; Vandenberge B; Jacobs R J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):352-8. PubMed ID: 20180895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis. Zhang F; Suh KJ; Lee KM PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Anterior teeth root inclination prediction derived from digital models: A comparative study of plaster study casts and CBCT images. Dastoori M; Bouserhal JP; Halazonetis DJ; Athanasiou AE J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Nov; 10(11):e1069-e1074. PubMed ID: 30607223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts. de Waard O; Rangel FA; Fudalej PS; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Breuning KH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of data obtained from impression scans and cast scans using different impression materials. Keul C; Runkel C; Güth JF; Schubert O Int J Comput Dent; 2020; 23(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 32555766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Efficacy of Constructing Digital Hybrid Skull-Dentition Images Using an Intraoral Scanner and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Lee JH; Byun SH; Yi SM; Park IY; Yang BE; Lee HL Scanning; 2022; 2022():8221514. PubMed ID: 35316954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Keul C; Güth JF Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):735-745. PubMed ID: 31134345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of number of registration points on the positional accuracy of a prosthetic treatment plan incorporated into a cone beam computed tomography scan by surface scan registration: An in vitro study. Jamjoom FZ; Yilmaz B; Johnston WM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Aug; 30(8):826-832. PubMed ID: 31161678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of linear and angular changes assessed in digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography. Massaro C; Losada C; Cevidanes L; Yatabe M; Garib D; Lauris JRP; Ioshida M; Rey D; Alvarez MA; Benavides E; Rios H; Aristizabal JF; Ruellas AC Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Feb; 23(1):118-128. PubMed ID: 31628885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption. Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Accuracy and Reproducibility of Linear Measurements Made on CBCT-derived Digital Models. Maroua AL; Ajaj M; Hajeer MY J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Apr; 17(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 27340163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Surface analysis of study models generated from OrthoCAD and cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Lightheart KG; English JD; Kau CH; Akyalcin S; Bussa HI; McGrory KR; McGrory KJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):686-93. PubMed ID: 22640670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dental image replacement on cone beam computed tomography with three-dimensional optical scanning of a dental cast, occlusal bite, or bite tray impression. Kang SH; Lee JW; Lim SH; Kim YH; Kim MK Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 43(10):1293-301. PubMed ID: 25015906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]