These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31915610)
41. Effect of length and location of edentulous area on the accuracy of prosthetic treatment plan incorporation into cone-beam computed tomography scans. Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; Lee DJ; McGlumphy EA; Yilmaz B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 29399999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models. Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Marginal fit of 3-unit CAD-CAM zirconia frameworks fabricated using cone beam computed tomography scans: an experimental study. Belgin HB; Kale E; Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B Odontology; 2022 Apr; 110(2):339-348. PubMed ID: 34665345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Accuracy of in-vitro tooth volumetric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography. Ye N; Jian F; Xue J; Wang S; Liao L; Huang W; Yang X; Zhou Y; Lai W; Li J; Wang J Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Dec; 142(6):879-87. PubMed ID: 23195374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Can lithium disilicate ceramic crowns be fabricated on the basis of CBCT data? Kauling AEC; Keul C; Erdelt K; Kühnisch J; Güth JF Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Oct; 23(10):3739-3748. PubMed ID: 30725188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Detection of various anatomic patterns of root canals in mandibular incisors using digital periapical radiography, 3 cone-beam computed tomographic scanners, and micro-computed tomographic imaging. Paes da Silva Ramos Fernandes LM; Rice D; Ordinola-Zapata R; Alvares Capelozza AL; Bramante CM; Jaramillo D; Christensen H J Endod; 2014 Jan; 40(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 24331989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans-a clinical validation study. Rangel FA; Maal TJJ; de Koning MJJ; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1215-1222. PubMed ID: 28932947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination. Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Digital impressions in dentistry-accuracy of impression digitalisation by desktop scanners. Runkel C; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Keul C Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1249-1257. PubMed ID: 31302771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Integration of digital dental casts in cone-beam computed tomography scans. Rangel FA; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM ISRN Dent; 2012; 2012():949086. PubMed ID: 23050159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of Tooth Size Measurements in Orthodontics Using Conventional and 3D Digital Study Models. Petrović V; Šlaj M; Buljan M; Čivljak T; Zulijani A; Perić B J Clin Med; 2024 Jan; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 38337424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. In vivo accuracy of tooth surface reconstruction based on CBCT and dental MRI-A clinical pilot study. Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Weber D; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Sep; 30(9):920-927. PubMed ID: 31257638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The impact of different cone beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scan parameters on virtual three-dimensional model accuracy using a highly precise ex vivo evaluation method. Matta RE; von Wilmowsky C; Neuhuber W; Lell M; Neukam FW; Adler W; Wichmann M; Bergauer B J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 44(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 27017101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Digital replacement of the distorted dentition acquired by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a pilot study. Nairn NJ; Ayoub AF; Barbenel J; Moos K; Naudi K; Ju X; Khambay BS Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 42(11):1488-93. PubMed ID: 23644040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison between Digital Casts and Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Measuring Maxillary Transverse Dimensions in Patients with Impacted Canines. Martinez Madero E; García Montarelo J; Aguayo GS; Martin C Children (Basel); 2022 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 35204998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [A pilot study of root position in orthodontic diagnosis model set-up]. Hou Y; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Wang S; Liu Y Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 50(10):631-5. PubMed ID: 26757636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [A pilot study on the accuracy of digital model reconstructed by cone beam CT]. Wu JC; Huang JN; Xu XJ Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Oct; 19(5):456-9. PubMed ID: 21161119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of in situ cone beam computed tomography scan data with ex vivo optical scan data in the measurement of root surface area. Jia P; Yang G; Hu W; Chung KH; Zhao Y; Liu M; Chen CS Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Nov; 128(5):552-557. PubMed ID: 31171483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Three-dimensional volume tomographic study of the imaging accuracy of impacted teeth: MSCT and CBCT comparison--an in vitro study. Hofmann E; Medelnik J; Fink M; Lell M; Hirschfelder U Eur J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 35(3):286-94. PubMed ID: 21378093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]