151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31915890)
1. [Systematic evidence analysis for comparison of MRI-targeted biopsy versus systematic biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer].
Sigle A; Jilg CA; Schmidt S; Miernik A
Urologe A; 2020 Feb; 59(2):185-188. PubMed ID: 31915890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [MRI of the prostate].
Nörenberg D; Solyanik O; Schlenker B; Magistro G; Ertl-Wagner B; Clevert DA; Stief C; Reiser MF; D'Anastasi M
Urologe A; 2017 May; 56(5):665-677. PubMed ID: 28424829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Biopsy.
Dianat SS; Carter HB; Macura KJ
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2015 Nov; 23(4):621-31. PubMed ID: 26499279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy allows for equivalent cancer detection with significantly fewer needle cores in biopsy-naive men.
Yarlagadda VK; Lai WS; Gordetsky JB; Porter KK; Nix JW; Thomas JV; Rais-Bahrami S
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(3):115-120. PubMed ID: 29770762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR Imaging-Targeted Prostate Biopsies.
Sarkar S; Verma S
Radiol Clin North Am; 2018 Mar; 56(2):289-300. PubMed ID: 29420983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anterior Localization of Prostate Cancer Suspicious Lesions in 1,161 Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsies.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Beyersdorff D; Preisser F; Tilki D; Fisch M; Graefen M; Budäus L
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 29935274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Elastic Versus Rigid Image Registration in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Venderink W; de Rooij M; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ; Fütterer JJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Mar; 4(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 28753777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy of the Prostate-An Update.
Das CJ; Razik A; Sharma S
Semin Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 53(3):219-226. PubMed ID: 30031415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI Targeted Prostate Biopsy Techniques:
Chang SD; Ghai S; Kim CK; Oto A; Giganti F; Moore CM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 34259038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR.
Rosenkrantz AB; Verma S; Choyke P; Eberhardt SC; Eggener SE; Gaitonde K; Haider MA; Margolis DJ; Marks LS; Pinto P; Sonn GA; Taneja SS
J Urol; 2016 Dec; 196(6):1613-1618. PubMed ID: 27320841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsy: What Radiologists Should Know.
Das CJ; Netaji A; Razik A; Verma S
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 21(9):1087-1094. PubMed ID: 32691544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate: correlation between the cancer detection rate and the number of previous negative TRUS biopsies.
Durmuş T; Reichelt U; Huppertz A; Hamm B; Beyersdorff D; Franiel T
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 23886937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Segmented diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: Application to transperineal in-bore 3T MR image-guided targeted biopsy.
Fedorov A; Tuncali K; Panych LP; Fairhurst J; Hassanzadeh E; Seethamraju RT; Tempany CM; Maier SE
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 34(8):1146-54. PubMed ID: 27240900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of complications rates between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion and systematic TRUS prostatic biopsies.
Queiroz MRG; Falsarella PM; Mariotti GC; Lemos GC; Baroni RH; Mussi TC; Garcia RG
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):732-738. PubMed ID: 30255444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Results of a comparative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted versus three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsies: Size does matter.
Peltier A; Aoun F; Albisinni S; Marcelis Q; Ledinh D; Paesmans M; Lemort M; van Velthoven R
Scand J Urol; 2016 Jun; 50(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 26754860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Initial series of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-fusion targeted prostate biopsy using the first transperineal targeted platform available in the USA.
Kosarek CD; Mahmoud AM; Eyzaguirre EJ; Shan Y; Walser EM; Horn GL; Williams SB
BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):909-912. PubMed ID: 29569311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Role of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies in Light of Overlap on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.
Patel N; Cricco-Lizza E; Kasabwala K; Xu C; Robinson BD; Khani F; Wang Y; Margolis D; Hu JC
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 1(4):263-267. PubMed ID: 31100246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimizing the Number of Cores Targeted During Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Target Biopsy.
Kenigsberg AP; Renson A; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Wysock JS; Taneja SS; Bjurlin MA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):418-425. PubMed ID: 31158081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
