These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31916002)

  • 1. Revision surgery of spinal dynamic implants: a literature review and algorithm proposal.
    Cecchinato R; Bourghli A; Obeid I
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Feb; 29(Suppl 1):57-65. PubMed ID: 31916002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
    Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reoperation rates and risk factors for revision 4 years after dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine.
    Rienmüller AC; Krieg SM; Schmidt FA; Meyer EL; Meyer B
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 29886162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Injury to major blood vessels in anterior thoracic and lumbar spinal surgery].
    Stulík J; Vyskocil T; Bodlák P; Sebesta P; Kryl J; Vojácek J; Pafko P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Apr; 73(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 16735005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Access strategies for revision or explantation of the Charité lumbar artificial disc replacement.
    Wagner WH; Regan JJ; Leary SP; Lanman TH; Johnson JP; Rao RK; Cossman DV
    J Vasc Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):1266-72. PubMed ID: 17145428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Spinal column: implants and revisions].
    Krieg SM; Meyer HS; Meyer B
    Chirurg; 2016 Mar; 87(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 26779646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results.
    Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Koureas G; Lambiris E
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(7):735-42. PubMed ID: 15087795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic stabilization for degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients.
    Di Silvestre M; Lolli F; Bakaloudis G; Parisini P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 20081518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revision open anterior approaches for spine procedures.
    Gumbs AA; Hanan S; Yue JJ; Shah RV; Sumpio B
    Spine J; 2007; 7(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 17482110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system.
    Stoll TM; Dubois G; Schwarzenbach O
    Eur Spine J; 2002 Oct; 11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S170-8. PubMed ID: 12384741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revision after spinal stenosis surgery.
    Le Huec JC; Seresti S; Bourret S; Cloche T; Monteiro J; Cirullo A; Roussouly P
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Feb; 29(Suppl 1):22-38. PubMed ID: 31997016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ten-year survival and clinical outcome of the AcroFlex lumbar disc replacement for the treatment of symptomatic disc degeneration.
    Meir AR; Freeman BJ; Fraser RD; Fowler SM
    Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 23384880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of reoperations after surgical treatment of degenerative cervical spine disorders: a report on 900 cases.
    Greiner-Perth R; Allam Y; El-Saghir H; Röhl F; Franke J; Böhm H
    Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2009 Feb; 70(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 19191203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unexpected positive cultures in presumed aseptic revision spine surgery using sonication.
    Pumberger M; Bürger J; Strube P; Akgün D; Putzier M
    Bone Joint J; 2019 May; 101-B(5):621-624. PubMed ID: 31039032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anterior exposure of the spine for removal of lumbar interbody devices and implants.
    Nguyen HV; Akbarnia BA; van Dam BE; Raiszadeh K; Bagheri R; Canale S; Sylvain GM; Barone R; Bench G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2449-53. PubMed ID: 17023854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
    Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revision strategies for salvaging or improving failed cylindrical cages.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Lee GA; Orbegoso CM; Haggerty CJ; Fedder IL; Griffith SL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Oct; 24(20):2147-53. PubMed ID: 10543014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Mid-term results of 360-degree lumbar spondylodesis with the use of a tantalum implant for disc replacement].
    Matejka J; Zeman J; Belatka J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):388-93. PubMed ID: 19912702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.