These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31916014)

  • 21. A review of improved fixation methods for dental implants. Part II: biomechanical integrity at bone-implant interface.
    Shibata Y; Tanimoto Y; Maruyama N; Nagakura M
    J Prosthodont Res; 2015 Apr; 59(2):84-95. PubMed ID: 25797023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Experimental and numerical tribological studies of a boundary lubricant functionalized poro-viscoelastic PVA hydrogel in normal contact and sliding.
    Blum MM; Ovaert TC
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Oct; 14():248-58. PubMed ID: 22947923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a non-linear finite element study.
    Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Tu MG; Ko CC; Shen YW
    J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):409-17. PubMed ID: 18384926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analytical modeling of the interaction of an ultrasonic wave with a rough bone-implant interface.
    Hériveaux Y; Nguyen VH; Biwa S; Haïat G
    Ultrasonics; 2020 Dec; 108():106223. PubMed ID: 32771811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Finite element analysis to determine implant preload.
    Lang LA; Kang B; Wang RF; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Dec; 90(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 14668754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of model parameters on finite element analysis of micromotions in implant dentistry.
    Winter W; Klein D; Karl M
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Feb; 39(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 23402356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
    Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant.
    Hudieb MI; Wakabayashi N; Kasugai S
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1061-70. PubMed ID: 21189091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A new interface element with progressive damage and osseointegration for modeling of interfaces in hip resurfacing.
    Caouette C; Bureau MN; Lavigne M; Vendittoli PA; Nuño N
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Mar; 227(3):209-20. PubMed ID: 23662336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of the material's stiffness on stress-shielding in osseointegrated implants for bone-anchored prostheses: a numerical analysis and initial benchmark data.
    Prochor P; Frossard L; Sajewicz E
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2020; 22(2):69-81. PubMed ID: 32868951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Probabilistic analysis of preload in the abutment screw of a dental implant complex.
    Guda T; Ross TA; Lang LA; Millwater HR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):183-93. PubMed ID: 18762030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Explicit finite element analysis can predict the mechanical response of conical implant press-fit in homogenized trabecular bone.
    Ovesy M; Aeschlimann M; Zysset PK
    J Biomech; 2020 Jun; 107():109844. PubMed ID: 32517857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of Micro Threads Alteration on Osseointegration and Primary Stability of Implants: An FEA and In Vivo Analysis in Rabbits.
    Chowdhary R; Halldin A; Jimbo R; Wennerberg A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):562-9. PubMed ID: 24034600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant stability in the atrophic posterior maxilla: a mathematical study of the sinus floor augmentation.
    Tepper G; Haas R; Zechner W; Krach W; Watzek G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Dec; 13(6):657-65. PubMed ID: 12519342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stress distribution in cylindrical and conical implants under rotational micromovement with different boundary conditions and bone properties: 3-D FEA.
    Dos Santos MBF; Meloto GO; Bacchi A; Correr-Sobrinho L
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Jun; 20(8):893-900. PubMed ID: 28347170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stress distribution in the single-unit osseointegrated dental implant: finite element analyses of axial and off-axial loading.
    O'Mahony A; Bowles Q; Woolsey G; Robinson SJ; Spencer P
    Implant Dent; 2000; 9(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 11307407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modal analysis for implant stability assessment: Sensitivity of this methodology for different implant designs.
    Zanetti EM; Ciaramella S; Calì M; Pascoletti G; Martorelli M; Asero R; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2018 Aug; 34(8):1235-1245. PubMed ID: 29891196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Experimental evidence for interfacial biochemical bonding in osseointegrated titanium implants.
    Sul YT; Kwon DH; Kang BS; Oh SJ; Johansson C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():8-19. PubMed ID: 22093014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mechanics of the tapered interference fit in dental implants.
    Bozkaya D; Müftü S
    J Biomech; 2003 Nov; 36(11):1649-58. PubMed ID: 14522206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.