132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31916401)
1. Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method.
Wargo RR; Aljabal AF; Lin PP
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):152-156. PubMed ID: 31916401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization and verification of lead thickness of commercially available lead foil tape for the measurements of lead equivalency of radio-protective shields.
Lin PP; Aljabal AF; Wargo RR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 21(7):216-220. PubMed ID: 32558227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of lead equivalence of radiation protection apparatuses as a function of tube potential and spectral shaping filter.
Aljabal AF; Wargo RR; Lin PP
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):204-209. PubMed ID: 31738469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the (f)utility of measuring the lead equivalence of protective garments.
Jones AK; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):063902. PubMed ID: 23718618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-662. PubMed ID: 28102605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Not all lightweight lead aprons and thyroid shields are alike.
Fakhoury E; Provencher JA; Subramaniam R; Finlay DJ
J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 70(1):246-250. PubMed ID: 30292602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation Protection Clothing in X-Ray Diagnostics - Influence of the Different Methods of Measurement on the Lead Equivalent and the Required Mass.
Schöpf T; Pichler T
Rofo; 2016 Aug; 188(8):768-75. PubMed ID: 27248650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Equivalent thicknesses of beam hardening filters consisting of aluminium, copper, Al/Cu and Al/Gold combinations and plumbiferous acrylic for 40 to 150 kVp diagnostic spectra.
Homolka P; Figl M
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Dec; 38(4):1269-1283. PubMed ID: 30115815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the effectiveness of X-ray protective aprons in experimental and practical fields.
Mori H; Koshida K; Ishigamori O; Matsubara K
Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jan; 7(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 24338033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of using scatter-mimicking beams instead of standard beams to measure penetration when assessing the protective value of radiation-protective garments.
Jones AK; Pasciak AS; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 29314058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the transmitted exposure through lead equivalent aprons used in a radiology department, including the contribution from backscatter.
Christodoulou EG; Goodsitt MM; Larson SC; Darner KL; Satti J; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1033-8. PubMed ID: 12852526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lightweight Lead Aprons: The Emperor's New Clothes in the Angiography Suite?
Lu H; Boyd C; Dawson J
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 May; 57(5):730-739. PubMed ID: 31005510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Radiation protection clothing in X-ray diagnostics - comparison of attenuation equivalents in narrow beam and inverse broad-beam geometry].
Pichler T; Schöpf T; Ennemoser O
Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 21246474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protective aprons in imaging departments: manufacturer stated lead equivalence values require validation.
Finnerty M; Brennan PC
Eur Radiol; 2005 Jul; 15(7):1477-84. PubMed ID: 15789212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Loss of image quality due to the image output of a digital radiographic system].
Jungnickel K; Redlich U
Z Med Phys; 2009; 19(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 19459587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
