132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31916401)
21. Using aluminum for scatter control in mammography: preliminary work using measurements of CNR and FOM.
Al Khalifah K; Davidson R; Zhou A
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Mar; 13(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 31749130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Measuring and Monte Carlo Modelling of X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Attenuation in Personal Radiation Shielding Protective Clothing.
Kozlovska M; Solc J; Otahal P
Comput Math Methods Med; 2019; 2019():1641895. PubMed ID: 31827582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. LEAD COMPOSITE VS. NONLEAD PROTECTIVE GARMENTS: WHICH ARE BETTER? A MULTIVENDOR COMPARISON.
Peters SMB; Zweers D; de Lange F; Mourik JEM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Aug; 175(4):460-465. PubMed ID: 28074020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Radiation protection in dental X-ray surgeries--still rooms for improvement.
Hart G; Dugdale M
Br Dent J; 2013 Mar; 214(6):E16. PubMed ID: 23519002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. (HP)Ge Measurement of spectra for diagnostic X-ray beams.
Nogueira MS; Mota HC; Campos LL
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 15367779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. OPTIMIZING IMAGE QUALITY, RADIATION DOSAGE TO THE PATIENT AND TO THE DETECTOR IN PEDIATRIC CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: A PHANTOM STUDY OF A PORTABLE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM.
Shahgeldi K; Sjöberg T; Nordström J; Lesanu R; Svahn TM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(4):414-420. PubMed ID: 30916753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Monte Carlo simulations of occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology.
Siiskonen T; Tapiovaara M; Kosunen A; Lehtinen M; Vartiainen E
Br J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 80(954):460-8. PubMed ID: 17151067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of the scattered radiations of lead and lead-free aprons in diagnostic radiology by MCNPX.
Tayebi M; Shooli FS; Saeedi-Moghadam M
Technol Health Care; 2017; 25(3):513-520. PubMed ID: 28085021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Light-weight lead aprons--light on weight, protection or labelling accuracy?
Muir S; McLeod R; Dove R
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Jun; 28(2):128-30. PubMed ID: 16060320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Addressing the efficiency of X-ray protective eyewear: Proposal for the introduction of a new comprehensive parameter, the Eye Protection Effectiveness (EPE).
Doria S; Fedeli L; Redapi L; Piffer S; Rossi F; Falivene A; Busoni S; Belli G; Gori C; Taddeucci A
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():216-223. PubMed ID: 32062466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimising automatic exposure control in computed radiography and the impact on patient dose.
Doyle P; Gentle D; Martin CJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):236-9. PubMed ID: 15933114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical Evaluation of Protective Garments with Respect to Garment Characteristics and Manufacturer Label Information.
Lichliter A; Weir V; Heithaus RE; Gipson S; Syed A; West J; Rees C
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):148-155. PubMed ID: 27789076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Examination of optimal radiation quality in the lead equivalent examination of X-ray protective clothing].
Inoue S; Matsumoto M; Matsuzawa R
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Dec; 60(12):1682-7. PubMed ID: 15614219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Scatter radiation intensities around a clinical digital breast tomosynthesis unit and the impact on radiation shielding considerations.
Yang K; Li X; Liu B
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1096-110. PubMed ID: 26936697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. On the primary barrier in diagnostic x-ray shielding.
Dixon RL
Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1785-93. PubMed ID: 7891641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A method to incorporate the effect of beam quality on image noise in a digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) based computer simulation for optimisation of digital radiography.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):7379-7393. PubMed ID: 28742062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Experimental and theoretical studies on radiation protective effect of a lighter non-lead protective apron].
Takano Y; Okazaki K; Ono K; Kai M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Jul; 61(7):1027-32. PubMed ID: 16049417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
