1838 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31917613)
1. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in High School and College-Aged Athletes: Does Autograft Choice Influence Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Rates?
; Spindler KP; Huston LJ; Zajichek A; Reinke EK; Amendola A; Andrish JT; Brophy RH; Dunn WR; Flanigan DC; Jones MH; Kaeding CC; Marx RG; Matava MJ; McCarty EC; Parker RD; Vidal AF; Wolcott ML; Wolf BR; Wright RW
Am J Sports Med; 2020 Feb; 48(2):298-309. PubMed ID: 31917613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Female Athletes: Patellar Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts.
Salem HS; Varzhapetyan V; Patel N; Dodson CC; Tjoumakaris FP; Freedman KB
Am J Sports Med; 2019 Jul; 47(9):2086-2092. PubMed ID: 31233335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions With Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Result in Lower Graft Rupture Rates but Similar Patient-Reported Outcomes as Compared With Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Comparison of 875 Patients.
Runer A; Csapo R; Hepperger C; Herbort M; Hoser C; Fink C
Am J Sports Med; 2020 Jul; 48(9):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 32667271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with high revision rates: results from the Danish Knee Ligament Registry.
Lind M; Strauss MJ; Nielsen T; Engebretsen L
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Jul; 28(7):2163-2169. PubMed ID: 31641810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Graft Diameter as a Predictor for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and KOOS and EQ-5D Values: A Cohort Study From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register Based on 2240 Patients.
Snaebjörnsson T; Hamrin Senorski E; Ayeni OR; Alentorn-Geli E; Krupic F; Norberg F; Karlsson J; Samuelsson K
Am J Sports Med; 2017 Jul; 45(9):2092-2097. PubMed ID: 28460194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients.
Samuelsen BT; Webster KE; Johnson NR; Hewett TE; Krych AJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Oct; 475(10):2459-2468. PubMed ID: 28205075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Higher Rate of Return to Preinjury Activity Levels After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in High-Activity Patients: Results From the New Zealand ACL Registry.
Rahardja R; Love H; Clatworthy MG; Monk AP; Young SW
Am J Sports Med; 2021 Nov; 49(13):3488-3494. PubMed ID: 34623948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of graft choice on the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort.
;
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Oct; 42(10):2301-10. PubMed ID: 25274353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidence of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction infections: graft choice makes a difference.
Maletis GB; Inacio MC; Reynolds S; Desmond JL; Maletis MM; Funahashi TT
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Aug; 41(8):1780-5. PubMed ID: 23749343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft Combined With Modified Lemaire Technique Versus Hamstring Graft Combined With Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Clinical Comparative Matched Study With a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years From The SANTI Study Group.
Rayes J; Ouanezar H; Haidar IM; Ngbilo C; Fradin T; Vieira TD; Freychet B; Sonnery-Cottet B
Am J Sports Med; 2022 Feb; 50(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 34898285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk factors associated with revision and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in the Kaiser Permanente ACLR registry.
Maletis GB; Inacio MC; Funahashi TT
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Mar; 43(3):641-7. PubMed ID: 25548148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increased knee laxity with hamstring tendon autograft compared to patellar tendon autograft: a cohort study of 5462 patients with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Cristiani R; Sarakatsianos V; Engström B; Samuelsson K; Forssblad M; Stålman A
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Feb; 27(2):381-388. PubMed ID: 29955930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Knee Pain and Difficulty With Kneeling Between Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Tendon Autografts After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Study From the New Zealand ACL Registry.
Rahardja R; Love H; Clatworthy MG; Young SW
Am J Sports Med; 2023 Nov; 51(13):3464-3472. PubMed ID: 37775983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association Between Graft Choice and 6-Year Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort.
; Wright RW; Huston LJ; Haas AK; Pennings JS; Allen CR; Cooper DE; DeBerardino TM; Dunn WR; Lantz BBA; Spindler KP; Stuart MJ; Albright JP; Amendola AN; Andrish JT; Annunziata CC; Arciero RA; Bach BR; Baker CL; Bartolozzi AR; Baumgarten KM; Bechler JR; Berg JH; Bernas GA; Brockmeier SF; Brophy RH; Bush-Joseph CA; Brad Butler V J; Campbell JD; Carey JL; Carpenter JE; Cole BJ; Cooper JM; Cox CL; Creighton RA; Dahm DL; David TS; Flanigan DC; Frederick RW; Ganley TJ; Garofoli EA; Gatt CJ; Gecha SR; Giffin JR; Hame SL; Hannafin JA; Harner CD; Harris NL; Hechtman KS; Hershman EB; Hoellrich RG; Johnson DC; Johnson TS; Jones MH; Kaeding CC; Kamath GV; Klootwyk TE; Levy BA; Ma CB; Maiers GP; Marx RG; Matava MJ; Mathien GM; McAllister DR; McCarty EC; McCormack RG; Miller BS; Nissen CW; O'Neill DF; Owens BD; Parker RD; Purnell ML; Ramappa AJ; Rauh MA; Rettig AC; Sekiya JK; Shea KG; Sherman OH; Slauterbeck JR; Smith MV; Spang JT; Svoboda LSJ; Taft TN; Tenuta JJ; Tingstad EM; Vidal AF; Viskontas DG; White RA; Williams JS; Wolcott ML; Wolf BR; York JJ
Am J Sports Med; 2021 Aug; 49(10):2589-2598. PubMed ID: 34260326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Return to Sports and Subsequent Injury Rates After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Patellar Tendon Autograft.
Shelbourne KD; Benner RW; Gray T
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jun; 42(6):1395-400. PubMed ID: 24627577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes for Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring-Tendon Autografts.
Mouarbes D; Menetrey J; Marot V; Courtot L; Berard E; Cavaignac E
Am J Sports Med; 2019 Dec; 47(14):3531-3540. PubMed ID: 30790526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The diameter of single bundle, hamstring autograft does not significantly influence revision rate or clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Wernecke GC; Constantinidis A; Harris IA; Seeto BG; Chen DB; MacDessi SJ
Knee; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1033-1038. PubMed ID: 28797872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores knee laxity but shows inferior functional knee outcome compared with primary reconstruction.
Cristiani R; Engström B; Edman G; Forssblad M; Stålman A
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Jan; 27(1):137-145. PubMed ID: 30014185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increased Risk of Revision After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Soft Tissue Allografts Compared With Autografts: Graft Processing and Time Make a Difference.
Maletis GB; Chen J; Inacio MCS; Love RM; Funahashi TT
Am J Sports Med; 2017 Jul; 45(8):1837-1844. PubMed ID: 28301224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Graft Choice on Revision and Contralateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the New Zealand ACL Registry.
Rahardja R; Zhu M; Love H; Clatworthy MG; Monk AP; Young SW
Am J Sports Med; 2020 Jan; 48(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 31730379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
