These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31917768)

  • 41. Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use.
    Schmerber S; Deguine O; Marx M; Van de Heyning P; Sterkers O; Mosnier I; Garin P; Godey B; Vincent C; Venail F; Mondain M; Deveze A; Lavieille JP; Karkas A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Apr; 274(4):1835-1851. PubMed ID: 27475796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Estimating Real-World Performance of Percutaneously Coupled Bone-Conduction Device Users With Severe-to-Profound Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Elkins E; Harvey A; Hillyer J; Hazlewood C; Watson S; Parbery-Clark A
    Am J Audiol; 2020 Jun; 29(2):170-187. PubMed ID: 32286081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Binaural Hearing Ability With Bilateral Bone Conduction Stimulation in Subjects With Normal Hearing: Implications for Bone Conduction Hearing Aids.
    Zeitooni M; Mäki-Torkko E; Stenfelt S
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):690-702. PubMed ID: 27560492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of varying unilateral conductive hearing losses on speech-in-noise discrimination: an experimental study with implications for surgical correction.
    Nia J; Bance M
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 Nov; 22(6):737-44. PubMed ID: 11698789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of a new powerful bone-anchored hearing system: a comparison study.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Hol MK; Mylanus EA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 23886427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An Evaluation of Hearing Aid Beamforming Microphone Arrays in a Noisy Laboratory Setting.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):131-144. PubMed ID: 30461406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The bone-anchored hearing aid for children: recent developments.
    Snik A; Leijendeckers J; Hol M; Mylanus E; Cremers C
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Sep; 47(9):554-9. PubMed ID: 18821224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study.
    den Besten CA; Monksfield P; Bosman A; Skarzynski PH; Green K; Runge C; Wigren S; Blechert JI; Flynn MC; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 44(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 30358920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Increased maximum power output may improve speech recognition with bone conduction hearing devices.
    Hua H; Goossens T; Lewis AT
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Aug; 61(8):670-677. PubMed ID: 34369239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. First experiences with a new adhesive bone conduction hearing device in children.
    Urík M; Hošnová D; Šlapák I; Jančíková J; Odstrčilík J; Jarkovský J; Baumgartner WD
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Nov; 126():109614. PubMed ID: 31377401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Unilateral versus bilateral amplification for adults with impaired hearing.
    Walden TC; Walden BE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Sep; 16(8):574-84. PubMed ID: 16295244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Binaural application of the bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Snik AF; Beynon AJ; Mylanus EA; van der Pouw CT; Cremers CW
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1998 Mar; 107(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 9525238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
    Marino R; Linton N; Eikelboom RH; Statham E; Rajan GP
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Audiometric results of bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid application in patients with bilateral congenital aural atresia.
    van der Pouw KT; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Laryngoscope; 1998 Apr; 108(4 Pt 1):548-53. PubMed ID: 9546268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Towards a Unified Testing Framework for Single-Sided Deafness Studies: A Consensus Paper.
    Van de Heyning P; Távora-Vieira D; Mertens G; Van Rompaey V; Rajan GP; Müller J; Hempel JM; Leander D; Polterauer D; Marx M; Usami SI; Kitoh R; Miyagawa M; Moteki H; Smilsky K; Baumgartner WD; Keintzel TG; Sprinzl GM; Wolf-Magele A; Arndt S; Wesarg T; Zirn S; Baumann U; Weissgerber T; Rader T; Hagen R; Kurz A; Rak K; Stokroos R; George E; Polo R; Medina MDM; Henkin Y; Hilly O; Ulanovski D; Rajeswaran R; Kameswaran M; Di Gregorio MF; Zernotti ME
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(6):391-398. PubMed ID: 28319951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge.
    Weiss R; Leinung M; Baumann U; Weißgerber T; Rader T; Stöver T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May; 274(5):2107-2115. PubMed ID: 28032241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Binaural auditory outcomes in patients with postlingual profound unilateral hearing loss: 3 years after cochlear implantation.
    Mertens G; Kleine Punte A; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20 Suppl 1():67-72. PubMed ID: 25997790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of 2 implantable bone conduction devices in patients with single-sided deafness using a daily alternating method.
    Desmet JB; Wouters K; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):1018-26. PubMed ID: 22772008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.