207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31918373)
1. Geometric inaccuracy and co-registration errors for CT, DynaCT and MRI images used in robotic stereotactic radiosurgery treatment planning.
Aldosary G; Szanto J; Holmes O; Lavigne B; Althobaity W; Sheikh A; Foottit C; Vandervoort E
Phys Med; 2020 Jan; 69():212-222. PubMed ID: 31918373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of MR stereotactic imaging and image co-registration accuracy for 3 different MR scanners by 3 different methods/phantoms: phantom and patient study.
Paštyková V; Novotný J; Veselský T; Urgošík D; Liščák R; Vymazal J
J Neurosurg; 2018 Dec; 129(Suppl1):125-132. PubMed ID: 30544292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Geometric distortion assessment in 3T MR images used for treatment planning in cranial Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Radiotherapy.
Theocharis S; Pappas EP; Seimenis I; Kouris P; Dellios D; Kollias G; Karaiskos P
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268925. PubMed ID: 35605005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Continuous table acquisition MRI for radiotherapy treatment planning: distortion assessment with a new extended 3D volumetric phantom.
Walker A; Liney G; Holloway L; Dowling J; Rivest-Henault D; Metcalfe P
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1982-91. PubMed ID: 25832089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. End-to-end validation of fiducial tracking accuracy in robotic radiosurgery using MRI-only simulation imaging.
Singhrao K; Zubair M; Nano T; Scholey JE; Descovich M
Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 51(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 38055419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The possibility of the use of MRI images in the three-dimensional external radiotherapy treatment planning].
Major T; Petrányi A; Varjas G; Németh G
Magy Onkol; 2002; 46(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 12368919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of accuracy in image co-registration with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Gamma Knife radiosurgery.
Nakazawa H; Mori Y; Komori M; Shibamoto Y; Tsugawa T; Kobayashi T; Hashizume C
J Radiat Res; 2014 Sep; 55(5):924-33. PubMed ID: 24781505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design and implementation of a 3D-MR/CT geometric image distortion phantom/analysis system for stereotactic radiosurgery.
Damyanovich AZ; Rieker M; Zhang B; Bissonnette JP; Jaffray DA
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(7):075010. PubMed ID: 29493533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of a novel 3D printed patient specific phantom for quality assurance in cranial stereotactic radiosurgery applications.
Makris DN; Pappas EP; Zoros E; Papanikolaou N; Saenz DL; Kalaitzakis G; Zourari K; Efstathopoulos E; Maris TG; Pappas E
Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105009. PubMed ID: 30965289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skull phantom-based methodology to validate MRI co-registration accuracy for Gamma Knife radiosurgery.
Oglesby RT; Lam WW; Ruschin M; Holden L; Sarfehnia A; Yeboah C; Sahgal A; Soliman H; Detsky J; Tseng CL; Myrehaug S; Husain Z; Lau AZ; Stanisz GJ; Chugh BP
Med Phys; 2022 Nov; 49(11):7071-7084. PubMed ID: 35842918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Geometrical accuracy of the Novalis stereotactic radiosurgery system for trigeminal neuralgia.
Rahimian J; Chen JC; Rao AA; Girvigian MR; Miller MJ; Greathouse HE
J Neurosurg; 2004 Nov; 101 Suppl 3():351-5. PubMed ID: 15537189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration.
Nousiainen K; Mäkelä T
MAGMA; 2020 Jun; 33(3):401-410. PubMed ID: 31646408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimizing magnetic resonance image geometric distortion at 7 Tesla for frameless presurgical planning using skin-adhered fiducials.
Kirby KM; Koons EK; Welker KM; Fagan AJ
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):694-701. PubMed ID: 36301228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A simple method for evaluating stereotactic accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Imaging in Frame Based Radiosurgery.
Sajeev T; Musthafa M; Sampath S; Indiradevi B; Bhanumathy G; Supe SS
Gulf J Oncolog; 2013 Jul; 1(14):6-13. PubMed ID: 23996861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of 3D geometric distortion of magnetic resonance imaging scanners commissioned for radiation therapy planning.
Torfeh T; Hammoud R; Perkins G; McGarry M; Aouadi S; Celik A; Hwang KP; Stancanello J; Petric P; Al-Hammadi N
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 34(5):645-53. PubMed ID: 26795695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Impact of planning CT slice thickness on the accuracy of automatic target registration using the on-board cone-beam CT].
Inoue H; Tanooka M; Doi H; Miura H; Nakagawa H; Sakai T; Oda M; Yasumasa K; Sakamoto K; Kamikonya N; Hirota S
Igaku Butsuri; 2011; 31(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 23002477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of dosimetric uncertainty caused by MR geometric distortion in MRI-based liver SBRT treatment planning.
Han S; Yin FF; Cai J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 20(2):43-50. PubMed ID: 30697915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the accuracy of deformable image registration on MRI with a physical phantom.
Wu RY; Liu AY; Yang J; Williamson TD; Wisdom PG; Bronk L; Gao S; Grosshan DR; Fuller DC; Gunn GB; Ronald Zhu X; Frank SJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):166-173. PubMed ID: 31808307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficient quality assurance method with automated data acquisition of a single phantom setup to determine radiation and imaging isocenter congruence.
Kang H; Patel R; Roeske JC
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):127-133. PubMed ID: 31535781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
