115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31919628)
1. Relevance of routine pathology review in cervical carcinoma.
van Beekhuizen HJ; Freulings MD; Dasgupta S; van Kemenade FJ; Ewing-Graham PC; van Doorn HC
Virchows Arch; 2020 Aug; 477(2):301-307. PubMed ID: 31919628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. False positive diagnosis in conventional and liquid-based cervical specimens.
Mount S; Harmon M; Eltabbakh G; Uyar D; Leiman G
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(3):363-71. PubMed ID: 15192952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
Kamimori T; Sakamoto K; Fujiwara K; Umayahara K; Sugiyama Y; Utsugi K; Takeshima N; Tanaka H; Gomi N; Takizawa K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 21721193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploratory celiotomy for cervical carcinoma: the role of histologic grading.
Sedlacek TV; Mangan CE; Giuntoli RL; Rocereto TF; Wheeler JE; Mikuta JJ
Gynecol Oncol; 1978 Apr; 6(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 648941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An analysis of the impact of pathology review in gynecologic cancer.
Chafe S; Honore L; Pearcey R; Capstick V
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1433-8. PubMed ID: 11121644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervicovaginal cytology in uterine adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma. Comparison of cytologic and histologic findings.
Costa MJ; Kenny MB; Naib ZM
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 1994621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of the frozen section in sharp knife cone biopsy of the cervix.
Woodford HD; Poston W; Elkins TE
J Reprod Med; 1986 Oct; 31(10):951-3. PubMed ID: 3537286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inaccuracy of cytologic diagnosis in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (CIN 3).
Lyall H; Duncan ID
Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 7847009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colposcopic accuracy in the diagnosis of microinvasive and occult invasive carcinoma of the cervix.
Benedet JL; Anderson GH; Boyes DA
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Apr; 65(4):557-62. PubMed ID: 3982729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening test results associated with cancer diagnoses in 287 women with cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Li Z; Austin RM; Guo M; Zhao C
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Dec; 136(12):1533-40. PubMed ID: 22900617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tissue and cell pathology in the classification of uterine cervix dysplasias and carcinoma in situ.
Nieburgs HE
Minerva Ginecol; 1970 Dec; 22(23):1135-41. PubMed ID: 5516044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the abnormal Pap smear.
Homesley HD
Am Fam Physician; 1977 Sep; 16(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 900003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance appearance of gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in comparison with that of usual-type endocervical adenocarcinoma: a pitfall of newly described unusual subtype of endocervical adenocarcinoma.
Kido A; Mikami Y; Koyama T; Kataoka M; Shitano F; Konishi I; Togashi K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1474-9. PubMed ID: 25188888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classification and grading of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Stendahl U; Willén H; Willén R
Acta Radiol Oncol Radiat Phys Biol; 1979; 18(6):481-96. PubMed ID: 543443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EZH2, Endothelin-1, and CD34 as Biomarkers of Aggressive Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Immunohistochemical Study.
Fathy A; Abdelrahman AE
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2018; 34(2):150-57. PubMed ID: 29630085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diagnosis and nature of carcinoma "in situ"].
Campos J
Prensa Med Argent; 1965 Apr; 52(11):561-3. PubMed ID: 5844030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Microinvasive squamous cell cervical carcinoma.
Raspagliesi F; Ditto A; Solima E; Quattrone P; Fontanelli R; Zanaboni F; Hanozet F; Spatti G; Calabrese E; Carcangiu ML
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2003 Dec; 48(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 14693337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selected clinical characteristics of Israeli Jewish women with squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a population-based study.
Kogan L; Menczer J; Shejter E; Liphshitz I; Barchana M
Isr Med Assoc J; 2011 Feb; 13(2):84-6. PubMed ID: 21443032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: comparison among T2-weighted, dynamic, and postcontrast T1-weighted images with histopathological correlation.
Tsuda K; Murakami T; Kurachi H; Ogawa H; Oi H; Miyake A; Narumi Y; Nakamura H
Abdom Imaging; 1997; 22(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 9000368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of second opinion pathology in the definitive management of patients with bladder carcinoma.
Coblentz TR; Mills SE; Theodorescu D
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 91(7):1284-90. PubMed ID: 11283928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
