These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31920236)

  • 1. Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope size 2 Macintosh blade with size 2 C-MAC D-Blade for laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in children with simulated cervical spine injury: A prospective randomized crossover study.
    Sinha R; Ray BR; Sharma A; Pandey RK; Punj J; Darlong V; Trikha A
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2019; 35(4):509-514. PubMed ID: 31920236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the conventional CMAC and the D-blade CMAC with the direct laryngoscopes in simulated cervical spine injury--a manikin study.
    Jain D; Dhankar M; Wig J; Jain A
    Braz J Anesthesiol; 2014; 64(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 24998112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective randomized comparative trial of pediatric C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope with McCoy direct laryngoscope for intubation in children posted for elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia.
    Kamal G; Agarwal D; Agarwal S; Gupta A; Gupta A; Kalra B; Gupta N
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2024 Aug; 34(8):750-757. PubMed ID: 38682461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of the conventional CMAC and the D-blade CMAC with the direct laryngoscopes in simulated cervical spine injury-a manikin study].
    Jain D; Dhankar M; Wig J; Jain A
    Braz J Anesthesiol; 2014; 64(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 25096773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized control led study comparing CMAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for insertion of double lumen tube in patients undergoing elective thoracotomy.
    Mathew A; Chandy J; Punnoose J; Gnanamuthu BR; Jeyseelan L; Sahajanandan R
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(2):266-271. PubMed ID: 34349378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the C-MAC D-Blade, Conventional C-MAC, and Macintosh Laryngoscopes in Simulated Easy and Difficult Airways.
    Kılıçaslan A; Topal A; Erol A; Uzun ST
    Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2014 Aug; 42(4):182-9. PubMed ID: 27366418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized crossover trial comparing cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope versus a C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope in a simulated immobilized cervical spine.
    Paik H; Park HP
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):201. PubMed ID: 32799791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Randomised Control Study Comparing C-MAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope (Hyper Angulated Blade) and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Insertion of a Double-Lumen Tube in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracotomy.
    Mathew A; Mathai RR; Theodore B; Chandy J; Yadav B; Singh G; Sahajanandan R
    Anesth Essays Res; 2022; 16(3):289-295. PubMed ID: 36620117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the first-attempt tracheal intubation success of the hyperangulated McGrath® X-blade vs the Macintosh-type CMAC videolaryngoscope in patients with cervical immobilization: a two-centre randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang J; Tan LZ; Toh H; Foo CW; Wijeratne S; Hu H; Seet E
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2022 Aug; 36(4):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 34347225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Direct laryngoscopy or C-MAC video laryngoscopy? Routine tracheal intubation in patients undergoing ENT surgery].
    Meininger D; Strouhal U; Weber CF; Fogl D; Holzer L; Zacharowski K; Byhahn C
    Anaesthesist; 2010 Sep; 59(9):806-11. PubMed ID: 20703441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Cormack Lehane Grading System and Intubation Difficulty Score in Patients Intubated by D-Blade Video and Direct Macintosh Laryngoscope: A Randomized Controlled Study.
    Pažur I; Maldini B; Hostić V; Ožegić O; Obraz M
    Acta Clin Croat; 2016 Dec; 55(4):560-564. PubMed ID: 29117475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the glidescope, CMAC, storz DCI with the Macintosh laryngoscope during simulated difficult laryngoscopy: a manikin study.
    Healy DW; Picton P; Morris M; Turner C
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2012 Jun; 12():11. PubMed ID: 22720884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Rigid Fiberscope with Direct Laryngoscopy in Easy and Difficult Airway Scenarios: A Manikin Study.
    Kaplan A; Göksu E; Yıldız G; Kılıç T
    J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 50(3):e107-14. PubMed ID: 26725922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study.
    Seo KH; Kim KM; John H; Jun JH; Han M; Kim S
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 May; 20(1):114. PubMed ID: 32408862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized controlled trial comparing C Mac D Blade and Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing surgeries for head and neck cancer.
    Hazarika H; Saxena A; Meshram P; Kumar Bhargava A
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2018; 12(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 29416454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Cricoid Pressure on Laryngeal View During Macintosh, McGrath MAC X-Blade and GlideScope Video Laryngoscopies.
    Arslan Zİ; Solak M
    Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2017 Dec; 45(6):361-366. PubMed ID: 29359076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the McGRATH
    Kim JY; Park S; Oh M; Choi JB; John HJ; Lee SK; Choi YH
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Jan; 59(2):. PubMed ID: 36837484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective Trial to Compare Direct and Indirect Laryngoscopy Using C-MAC PM® with Macintosh Blade and D-Blade® in a Simulated Difficult Airway.
    Raimann FJ; Dietze PE; Cuca CE; Meininger D; Kessler P; Byhahn C; Gill-Schuster D; Zacharowski K; Mutlak H
    Emerg Med Int; 2019; 2019():1067473. PubMed ID: 31065384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Time to Intubation of a Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Utilizing C-MAC® Versus GlideScope® Versus Macintosh Blade: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.
    Rajagopal S; Gardner RN; Swanson E; Kim S; Sondekoppam R; Ueda K; Hanada S
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50523. PubMed ID: 38222170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Evaluation of McGrath MAC, Truview Video Laryngoscopes and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Surgery under General Anaesthesia.
    Kaur G; Gupta S; Mehta N; Dhingra JS
    Anesth Essays Res; 2020; 14(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 32843786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.