BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31921906)

  • 1. Virtual Fencing Is Comparable to Electric Tape Fencing for Cattle Behavior and Welfare.
    Campbell DLM; Lea JM; Keshavarzi H; Lee C
    Front Vet Sci; 2019; 6():445. PubMed ID: 31921906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Virtual fencing technology to intensively graze lactating dairy cattle. II: Effects on cow welfare and behavior.
    Verdon M; Langworthy A; Rawnsley R
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jun; 104(6):7084-7094. PubMed ID: 33814145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stress indicators in dairy cows adapting to virtual fencing.
    Fuchs P; Stachowicz J; Schneider MK; Probo M; Bruckmaier RM; Umstätter C
    J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 38271563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Virtual Fencing Technology Excludes Beef Cattle from an Environmentally Sensitive Area.
    Campbell DLM; Ouzman J; Mowat D; Lea JM; Lee C; Llewellyn RS
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 32575756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Virtual fencing technology to intensively graze lactating dairy cattle. I: Technology efficacy and pasture utilization.
    Langworthy AD; Verdon M; Freeman MJ; Corkrey R; Hills JL; Rawnsley RP
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jun; 104(6):7071-7083. PubMed ID: 33814143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How do grazing beef and dairy cattle respond to virtual fences? A review.
    Wilms L; Komainda M; Hamidi D; Riesch F; Horn J; Isselstein J
    J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 38619181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tech-Savvy Beef Cattle? How Heifers Respond to Moving Virtual Fence Lines.
    Campbell DLM; Lea JM; Farrer WJ; Haynes SJ; Lee C
    Animals (Basel); 2017 Sep; 7(9):. PubMed ID: 28926989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporary Exclusion of Cattle from a Riparian Zone Using Virtual Fencing Technology.
    Campbell DLM; Haynes SJ; Lea JM; Farrer WJ; Lee C
    Animals (Basel); 2018 Dec; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 30583490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Virtual Fence Responses Are Socially Facilitated in Beef Cattle.
    Keshavarzi H; Lee C; Lea JM; Campbell DLM
    Front Vet Sci; 2020; 7():543158. PubMed ID: 33195516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A matter of age? How age affects the adaptation of lactating dairy cows to virtual fencing.
    Confessore A; Schneider MK; Pauler CM; Aquilani C; Fuchs P; Pugliese C; Dibari C; Argenti G; Accorsi PA; Probo M
    J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 38743503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controlling Within-Field Sheep Movement Using Virtual Fencing.
    Marini D; Llewellyn R; Belson S; Lee C
    Animals (Basel); 2018 Feb; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 29495364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does Virtual Fencing Work for Grazing Dairy Cattle?
    Lomax S; Colusso P; Clark CEF
    Animals (Basel); 2019 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 31288490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Heifers don't care: no evidence of negative impact on animal welfare of growing heifers when using virtual fences compared to physical fences for grazing.
    Hamidi D; Grinnell NA; Komainda M; Riesch F; Horn J; Ammer S; Traulsen I; Palme R; Hamidi M; Isselstein J
    Animal; 2022 Sep; 16(9):100614. PubMed ID: 35985122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should Dairy Cattle Be Trained to a Virtual Fence System as Individuals or in Groups?
    Colusso PI; Clark CEF; Lomax S
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 33003613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pre-Exposure to an Electrical Stimulus Primes Associative Pairing of Audio and Electrical Stimuli for Dairy Heifers in a Virtual Fencing Feed Attractant Trial.
    Verdon M; Lee C; Marini D; Rawnsley R
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Jan; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 32013020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social influence on the effectiveness of virtual fencing in sheep.
    Marini D; Kearton T; Ouzman J; Llewellyn R; Belson S; Lee C
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10066. PubMed ID: 33062448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated Virtual Fencing Can Effectively Contain Sheep: Field Trials and Prospects.
    Campbell DLM; Belson S; Lea JM; Ouzman J; Lee C; Kalinowski T; Mowat D; Llewellyn RS
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 36830406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is Virtual Fencing an Effective Way of Enclosing Cattle? Personality, Herd Behaviour and Welfare.
    Aaser MF; Staahltoft SK; Korsgaard AH; Trige-Esbensen A; Alstrup AKO; Sonne C; Pertoldi C; Bruhn D; Frikke J; Linder AC
    Animals (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 35405832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioral Adaptations of Nursing Brangus Cows to Virtual Fencing: Insights from a Training Deployment Phase.
    Nyamuryekung'e S; Cox A; Perea A; Estell R; Cibils AF; Holland JP; Waterhouse T; Duff G; Funk M; McIntosh MM; Spiegal S; Bestelmeyer B; Utsumi S
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Nov; 13(22):. PubMed ID: 38003174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Influence of Predictability and Controllability on Stress Responses to the Aversive Component of a Virtual Fence.
    Kearton T; Marini D; Cowley F; Belson S; Keshavarzi H; Mayes B; Lee C
    Front Vet Sci; 2020; 7():580523. PubMed ID: 33330702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.