These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31922611)

  • 1. Development and Implementation of an Effective Blind Proficiency Testing Program.
    Pierce ML; Cook LJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 May; 65(3):809-814. PubMed ID: 31922611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementation of a Blind Quality Control Program in a Forensic Laboratory.
    Hundl C; Neuman M; Rairden A; Rearden P; Stout P
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 May; 65(3):815-822. PubMed ID: 31873940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementing blind proficiency testing in forensic laboratories: Motivation, obstacles, and recommendations.
    Mejia R; Cuellar M; Salyards J
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2020; 2():293-298. PubMed ID: 33083776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Latent print quality in blind proficiency testing: Using quality metrics to examine laboratory performance.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jul; 324():110823. PubMed ID: 34004529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Latent Print Proficiency Testing: An Examination of Test Respondents, Test-Taking Procedures, and Test Characteristics.
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Pan KDH
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):450-457. PubMed ID: 31509243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The feasibility of external blind DNA proficiency testing. I. Background and findings.
    Peterson JL; Lin G; Ho M; Chen Y; Gaensslen RE
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jan; 48(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12570195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The feasibility of external blind DNA proficiency testing. II. Experience with actual blind tests.
    Peterson JL; Lin G; Ho M; Chen Y; Gaensslen RE
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jan; 48(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 12570196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How do latent print examiners perceive proficiency testing? An analysis of examiner perceptions, performance, and print quality.
    Kelley S; Gardner BO; Murrie DC; Pan KDH; Kafadar K
    Sci Justice; 2020 Mar; 60(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 32111284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation of a Blind Quality Control Program in Blood Alcohol Analysis.
    Moral J; Hundl C; Lee D; Neuman M; Grimaldi A; Cuellar M; Stout P
    J Anal Toxicol; 2019 Sep; 43(8):630-636. PubMed ID: 31424073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proficiency testing and ring trials.
    Johnson P; Cabuang L
    Rev Sci Tech; 2021 Jun; 40(1):189-203. PubMed ID: 34140731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality control and quality assurance.
    Laessig RH; Ehrmeyer SS; Hassemer DJ
    Clin Lab Med; 1986 Jun; 6(2):317-27. PubMed ID: 3720254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptions of blind proficiency testing among latent print examiners.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M
    Sci Justice; 2023 Mar; 63(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 36870700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Overview of Proficiency Testing and External Quality Assessment Programs of Laboratory Tests from the Standpoint of International Standardization].
    Miyachi H
    Rinsho Byori; 2015 Aug; 63(8):919-24. PubMed ID: 26638428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computerized training and proficiency testing. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    Vooijs GP; Davey DD; Somrak TM; Goodell RM; Grohs DH; Knesel EA; Mango LJ; Mui KK; Nielsen ML; Wilbur DC
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 9479333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Crime laboratory proficiency testing results, 1978-1991, I: Identification and classification of physical evidence.
    Peterson JL; Markham PN
    J Forensic Sci; 1995 Nov; 40(6):994-1008. PubMed ID: 8522932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Educational antimicrobial susceptibility testing as a critical component of microbiology laboratory proficiency programs: American Proficiency Institute results for 2007-2011.
    Jones RN; Glick T; Sader HS; Flamm RK; Ross JE; Rhomberg PR; Edson DC
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2013 Apr; 75(4):357-60. PubMed ID: 23481025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blind testing in firearms: Preliminary results from a blind quality control program.
    Neuman M; Hundl C; Grimaldi A; Eudaley D; Stein D; Stout P
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):964-974. PubMed ID: 35349174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The contribution of proficiency testing to improving laboratory performance and ensuring quality patient care.
    Johnson PR
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2004; 18(6):335-41. PubMed ID: 15597555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementation of forensic DNA analysis on casework evidence at the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Crime Laboratory: historical perspective.
    Crouse CA
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 11387632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality control, quality assurance, and proficiency testing in the andrology laboratory.
    Keel BA
    Arch Androl; 2002; 48(6):417-31. PubMed ID: 12425759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.