These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy. Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Gaudineau A; Senat MV; Ehlinger V; Gallini A; Morin M; Olivier P; Roth E; Orusco E; Javoise S; Fort J; Lavergne C; Arnaud C; Rozenberg P; Vayssiere C; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized trial. Sanchez-Ramos L; Peterson DE; Delke I; Gaudier FL; Kaunitz AM Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Mar; 91(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 9491868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Misoprostol vaginal insert and time to vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Wing DA; Brown R; Plante LA; Miller H; Rugarn O; Powers BL Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 122(2 Pt 1):201-209. PubMed ID: 23857539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Induction of labor in twin pregnancies with oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone--is it effective and safe? Huber G; Schütz H; Seelbach-Göbel B J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jun; 28(9):1043-6. PubMed ID: 25001425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial. le Roux PA; Olarogun JO; Penny J; Anthony J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 11814497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel. Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison]. Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison. Bartha JL; Comino-Delgado R; Garcia-Benasach F; Martinez-Del-Fresno P; Moreno-Corral LJ Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 10960643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labor: a systematic review. Kundodyiwa TW; Alfirevic Z; Weeks AD Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 113(2 Pt 1):374-83. PubMed ID: 19155909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Mundle WR; Young DC Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 88(4 Pt 1):521-5. PubMed ID: 8841210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review. Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]