These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31923193)

  • 1. Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial.
    Young DC; Delaney T; Armson BA; Fanning C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227245. PubMed ID: 31923193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
    Kerr RS; Kumar N; Williams MJ; Cuthbert A; Aflaifel N; Haas DM; Weeks AD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Jun; 6(6):CD014484. PubMed ID: 34155622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor.
    Rouzi AA; Alsibiani S; Mansouri N; Alsinani N; Darhouse K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23999422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Excessive uterine activity accompanying induced labor.
    Crane JM; Young DC; Butt KD; Bennett KA; Hutchens D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 97(6):926-31. PubMed ID: 11384698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
    Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
    Gaudineau A; Senat MV; Ehlinger V; Gallini A; Morin M; Olivier P; Roth E; Orusco E; Javoise S; Fort J; Lavergne C; Arnaud C; Rozenberg P; Vayssiere C;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized trial.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Peterson DE; Delke I; Gaudier FL; Kaunitz AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Mar; 91(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 9491868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Misoprostol vaginal insert and time to vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Wing DA; Brown R; Plante LA; Miller H; Rugarn O; Powers BL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 122(2 Pt 1):201-209. PubMed ID: 23857539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Induction of labor in twin pregnancies with oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone--is it effective and safe?
    Huber G; Schütz H; Seelbach-Göbel B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jun; 28(9):1043-6. PubMed ID: 25001425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    le Roux PA; Olarogun JO; Penny J; Anthony J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 11814497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
    Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
    Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison.
    Bartha JL; Comino-Delgado R; Garcia-Benasach F; Martinez-Del-Fresno P; Moreno-Corral LJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 10960643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labor: a systematic review.
    Kundodyiwa TW; Alfirevic Z; Weeks AD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 113(2 Pt 1):374-83. PubMed ID: 19155909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mundle WR; Young DC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 88(4 Pt 1):521-5. PubMed ID: 8841210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.