These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31923287)
1. The Influence of Progressive Static Load on the Ability of Dental Implants to Withstand Overloading Forces: An Experimental Study in Dogs. Podaropoulos L; Trisi P; Papadimitriou S; Lazzara RJ; Kalyvas D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 31923287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone reactions around dental implants subjected to progressive static load: an experimental study in dogs. Podaropoulos L; Veis AA; Trisi P; Papadimitriou S; Alexandridis C; Kalyvas D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Jul; 27(7):910-7. PubMed ID: 26202378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of implant overloading on the peri-implant bone in inflamed and non-inflamed peri-implant mucosa. Kozlovsky A; Tal H; Laufer BZ; Leshem R; Rohrer MD; Weinreb M; Artzi Z Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):601-10. PubMed ID: 17655715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in peri-implant tissues subjected to orthodontic forces and ligature breakdown in monkeys. Hürzeler MB; Quiñones CR; Kohal RJ; Rohde M; Strub JR; Teuscher U; Caffesse RG J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):396-404. PubMed ID: 9579628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone-implant interface around titanium implants under different loading conditions: a histomorphometrical analysis in the Macaca fascicularis monkey. Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Wicht H; Yacoob H; Nentwig GH J Periodontol; 2003 Oct; 74(10):1483-90. PubMed ID: 14653395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Observation of the bone surrounding an overloaded implant in a novel rat model. Nagasawa M; Takano R; Maeda T; Uoshima K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 23377055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis. Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Swaminathan D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 11858574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dental implants: early versus standard two-stage loading (animal study). Rismanchian M; Bajoghli F; Gholamreza T; Razavi M J Oral Implantol; 2014 Feb; 40(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 22214517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of non-matching implant and abutment diameters on radiographic crestal bone levels in dogs. Jung RE; Jones AA; Higginbottom FL; Wilson TG; Schoolfield J; Buser D; Hämmerle CH; Cochran DL J Periodontol; 2008 Feb; 79(2):260-70. PubMed ID: 18251640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part II: a pilot study in dogs. Negri B; Calvo-Guirado JL; Ramírez-Fernández MP; Maté Sánchez-de Val J; Guardia J; Muñoz-Guzón F Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Feb; 23(2):236-244. PubMed ID: 22092544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible. King GN; Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Buser D; Cochran DL J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone of immediate or delayed occlusal-loaded non-splinted implants in the posterior mandible--an experimental study in monkeys. Stokholm R; Isidor F; Nyengaard JR Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1311-1318. PubMed ID: 24118392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immediate loading of modular transitional implants: a histologic and histomorphometric study in dogs. Zubery Y; Bichacho N; Moses O; Tal H Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1999 Aug; 19(4):343-53. PubMed ID: 10709501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histomorphometrical and clinical comparison of submerged and nonsubmerged implants subjected to experimental peri-implantitis in dogs. Zechner W; Kneissel M; Kim S; Ulm C; Watzek G; Plenk H Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 14731174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of loading time on osseointegration and new bone formation around dental implants: a histologic and histomorphometric study in dogs. Ghanavati F; Shayegh SS; Rahimi H; Sharifi D; Ghanavati F; Khalesseh N; Eslami B J Periodontol; 2006 Oct; 77(10):1701-7. PubMed ID: 17032113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of different loading times on the bone response around dental implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Jayme SJ; de Oliveira RR; Muglia VA; Novaes AB; Ribeiro RF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):473-81. PubMed ID: 20556245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between magnitude of immediate loading and peri-implant osteogenesis in dogs. Esaki D; Matsushita Y; Ayukawa Y; Sakai N; Sawae Y; Koyano K Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1290-6. PubMed ID: 22092309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histological, radiological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate vs. non-immediate loading of a zirconia implant with surface treatment in a dog model. Calvo-Guirado JL; Aguilar-Salvatierra A; Gomez-Moreno G; Guardia J; Delgado-Ruiz RA; Mate-Sanchez de Val JE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):826-30. PubMed ID: 23551427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone response to early orthodontic loading of endosseous implants. Yavuz U; Kirtiloglu T; Acikgoz G; Turk T; Trisi P J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():87-95. PubMed ID: 20594061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]