These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31924174)
1. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after corneal refractive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Zhang H; Sun Z; Li L; Sun R; Zhang H BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 31924174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma. Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK. Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Goldmann Applanation Tonometer Versus Ocular Response Analyzer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty. Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Masoudi A; Azari AA; Veisi A Cornea; 2018 Nov; 37(11):1370-1375. PubMed ID: 29877927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Goldmann applanation tonometry versus ocular response analyzer for intraocular pressure measurements in keratoconic eyes. Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Avni I; Zadok D Cornea; 2010 Sep; 29(9):1011-5. PubMed ID: 20539214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in healthy individuals. Ouyang PB; Li CY; Zhu XH; Duan XC Int J Ophthalmol; 2012; 5(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 22553765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes. Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes. Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of corneal geometrical and biomechanical properties on tonometry readings in keratoconic eyes. Bilgeç MD; Atalay E; Sözer Ö; Gürsoy H; Bilgin M; Yıldırım N Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 31792851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters. Bao F; Huang Z; Huang J; Wang J; Deng M; Li L; Yu A; Wang Q; Elsheikh A J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun; 25(6):510-9. PubMed ID: 26709500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of corneal astigmatism on intraocular pressure measurement using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Hagishima M; Kamiya K; Fujimura F; Morita T; Shoji N; Shimizu K Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Feb; 248(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 19787365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients. Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-Contact and Contact Tonometry in Corneal Edema. Gür Güngör S; Akman A; Küçüködük A; Asena L; Şimşek C; Yazici AC Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jan; 93(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 26583789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Goldmann applanation tonometer versus ocular response analyzer for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery. Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Kheiri B Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):582-589. PubMed ID: 30246567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of intraocular pressure adjusted by central corneal thickness or corneal biomechanical properties as measured in glaucomatous eyes using noncontact tonometers and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Yaoeda K; Fukushima A; Shirakashi M; Fukuchi T Clin Ophthalmol; 2016; 10():829-34. PubMed ID: 27274187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Kirwan C; O'Keefe M J Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 24(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 18500086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis. Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of cornea on intraocular pressure measurement by ICARE PRO and ORA. Pluháček F; Unzeitigová A; Marešová K; Rybář J Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2019; 75(3):111-118. PubMed ID: 31779459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]