These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31924286)

  • 1. Validation of presumptive tests for non-human blood using Kastle Meyer and Hemastix reagents.
    Casali F; Ciavaglia SA; Gannicliffe C; Lidstone N; Webster LMI
    Sci Justice; 2020 Jan; 60(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 31924286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of presumptive blood test kits including hexagon OBTI.
    Johnston E; Ames CE; Dagnall KE; Foster J; Daniel BE
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 May; 53(3):687-9. PubMed ID: 18471215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kastle-Meyer blood test reagents are deleterious to DNA.
    Sloots J; Lalonde W; Reid B; Millman J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Dec; 281():141-146. PubMed ID: 29128654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the presumptive luminol test for blood with four non-chemiluminescent forensic techniques.
    Webb JL; Creamer JI; Quickenden TI
    Luminescence; 2006; 21(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 16645959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of sensitivity and vestigiality of presumptive tests for swabbed blood stains.
    Jaremko KL; Pitts A; Hascall A; Briskie A; Redmond B; Kaur D; Curtis G; LaVena H; West J; Du P; Hernandez S; Silva DSBS
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37747678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of mark enhancement techniques on the presumptive and confirmatory tests for blood.
    Stewart V; Deacon P; Zahra N; Uchimoto ML; Farrugia KJ
    Sci Justice; 2018 Nov; 58(6):386-396. PubMed ID: 30446067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phenolphthalein false-positive reactions from legume root nodules.
    Petersen D; Kovacs F
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Mar; 59(2):481-4. PubMed ID: 24313711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Case study: Loss of Kastle-Meyer test specificity on jeans.
    Lalonde W; Millman JS
    Sci Justice; 2019 May; 59(3):359-361. PubMed ID: 31054825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of Hemastix and the subsequent lack of DNA recovery using the Promega DNA IQ system.
    Poon H; Elliott J; Modler J; Frégeau C
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Nov; 54(6):1278-86. PubMed ID: 19804523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of six presumptive tests for blood, their specificity, sensitivity, and effect on high molecular-weight DNA.
    Tobe SS; Watson N; Daéid NN
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jan; 52(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 17209919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct-STR typing from presumptively-tested and untreated body fluids.
    Thanakiatkrai P; Raham K; Pradutkanchana J; Sotthibandhu S; Kitpipit T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Sep; 30():1-9. PubMed ID: 28605649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Preliminary tests with Hemastix and Sangur test strips and Phosphatesmo KM test paper do not modify DNA typing of blood and semen stains].
    Liechti-Gallati S; Borer U
    Arch Kriminol; 1994; 193(1-2):37-42. PubMed ID: 7908512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The application of visible wavelength reflectance hyperspectral imaging for the detection and identification of blood stains.
    Li B; Beveridge P; O'Hare WT; Islam M
    Sci Justice; 2014 Dec; 54(6):432-8. PubMed ID: 25498930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity and specificity of presumptive tests for blood, saliva and semen.
    Vennemann M; Scott G; Curran L; Bittner F; Tobe SS
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2014 Mar; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 24443142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of Hemastix® severely reduces DNA recovery using the BioRobot® EZ1.
    Petersen D; Kaplan M
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 May; 56(3):733-5. PubMed ID: 21361957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comprehensive study into false positive rates for 'other' biological samples using common presumptive testing methods.
    Stroud A; Gamblin A; Birchall P; Harbison S; Opperman S
    Sci Justice; 2023 May; 63(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 37169467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chemical enhancement techniques of bloodstain patterns and DNA recovery after fire exposure.
    Tontarski KL; Hoskins KA; Watkins TG; Brun-Conti L; Michaud AL
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jan; 54(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 19018938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bloodstains on Leather: Examination of False Negatives in Presumptive Test and Human Hemoglobin Test.
    Castelló A; Francès F; Verdú F
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Sep; 62(5):1308-1313. PubMed ID: 28185261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
    Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
    Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Active oxygen doctors the evidence.
    Castelló A; Francès F; Corella D; Verdú F
    Naturwissenschaften; 2009 Feb; 96(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 18936905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.