These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31924294)

  • 21. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.
    Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 29160024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The US Department of Justice stumbles on visual perception.
    Albright TD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jun; 118(24):. PubMed ID: 34031260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The impact of Brexit on the future of UK forensic science and technology.
    Wilson TJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109870. PubMed ID: 31302414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Conceptualising forensic science and forensic reconstruction. Part II: The critical interaction between research, policy/law and practice.
    Morgan RM
    Sci Justice; 2017 Nov; 57(6):460-467. PubMed ID: 29173460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices.
    Bali AS; Edmond G; Ballantyne KN; Kemp RI; Martire KA
    Sci Justice; 2020 May; 60(3):216-224. PubMed ID: 32381238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Just truth? Carefully applying history, philosophy and sociology of science to the forensic use of CCTV images.
    Edmond G
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 23036862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners.
    Edmond G; Towler A; Growns B; Ribeiro G; Found B; White D; Ballantyne K; Searston RA; Thompson MB; Tangen JM; Kemp RI; Martire K
    Sci Justice; 2017 Mar; 57(2):144-154. PubMed ID: 28284440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review.
    Cooper GS; Meterko V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():35-46. PubMed ID: 30769302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Human Factors Effecting Forensic Decision Making: Workplace Stress and Well-being.
    Jeanguenat AM; Dror IE
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):258-261. PubMed ID: 28464220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The future of forensic and crime scene science. Part II. A UK perspective on forensic science education.
    Mennell J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Mar; 157 Suppl 1():S13-20. PubMed ID: 16431055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science.
    Camilleri A; Abarno D; Bird C; Coxon A; Mitchell N; Redman K; Sly N; Wills S; Silenieks E; Simpson E; Lindsay H
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):533-543. PubMed ID: 31472798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dynamic Decision Making: Learning Processes and New Research Directions.
    Gonzalez C; Fakhari P; Busemeyer J
    Hum Factors; 2017 Aug; 59(5):713-721. PubMed ID: 28548893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Current State of Forensic Science Improvement in the United States: Lessons from Wrongful Convictions.
    Morgan JS
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2024 Jan; 36(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 38297426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. To trace or not to trace: A survey of how police use and perceive chemical trace evidence.
    Woodman PA; Julian R; Spiranovic C; Ballantyne KN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Apr; 309():110178. PubMed ID: 32135411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Management of crime scene units by Quebec police senior managers: Insight on forensic knowledge and understanding of key stakeholders.
    Mousseau V; Baechler S; Crispino F
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):524-532. PubMed ID: 31472797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Strengthening forensic DNA decision making through a better understanding of the influence of cognitive bias.
    Jeanguenat AM; Budowle B; Dror IE
    Sci Justice; 2017 Nov; 57(6):415-420. PubMed ID: 29173454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Systems Approach to Biometrics in the Military Domain.
    Wilson L; Gahan M; Lennard C; Robertson J
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1858-1863. PubMed ID: 29464706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A collaborative approach for incorporating forensic case data into crime investigation using criminal intelligence analysis and visualisation.
    Rossy Q; Ribaux O
    Sci Justice; 2014 Mar; 54(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 24630325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A call for more science in forensic science.
    Bell S; Sah S; Albright TD; Gates SJ; Denton MB; Casadevall A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(18):4541-4544. PubMed ID: 29650539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Beliefs about error rates and human judgment in forensic science.
    Ribeiro G; Tangen JM; McKimmie BM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():138-147. PubMed ID: 30802644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.