194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31924419)
21. On the accuracy of intracardiac flow velocimetry methods.
Kheradvar A
J Echocardiogr; 2017 Jun; 15(2):67-69. PubMed ID: 28205061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of 4D Flow MRI and Particle Image Velocimetry Using an In Vitro Carotid Bifurcation Model.
Medero R; Hoffman C; Roldán-Alzate A
Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2112-2122. PubMed ID: 30112708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Echo particle image velocimetry.
DeMarchi N; White C
J Vis Exp; 2012 Dec; (70):. PubMed ID: 23299186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Two-dimensional measurement of blood flow velocity in rat arteries based on ultrasonic particle image velocimetry].
Zhu Y; Qian M; Niu L; Zheng H; Lu G
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2014 Aug; 34(9):1305-9. PubMed ID: 25263364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Time-Resolved Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements with Wall Shear Stress and Uncertainty Quantification for the FDA Nozzle Model.
Raben JS; Hariharan P; Robinson R; Malinauskas R; Vlachos PP
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2016 Mar; 7(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 26628081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of human left ventricle flow using statistical shape modelling and computational fluid dynamics.
Khalafvand SS; Voorneveld JD; Muralidharan A; Gijsen FJH; Bosch JG; van Walsum T; Haak A; de Jong N; Kenjeres S
J Biomech; 2018 Jun; 74():116-125. PubMed ID: 29729852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sub-piexl methods for improving vector quality in echo PIV flow, imaging technology.
Niu L; Wang J; Qian M; Zheng H
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():487-90. PubMed ID: 19963463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Left ventricular flow analysis: recent advances in numerical methods and applications in cardiac ultrasound.
Borazjani I; Westerdale J; McMahon EM; Rajaraman PK; Heys JJ; Belohlavek M
Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():395081. PubMed ID: 23690874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimization of 3-D Divergence-Free Flow Field Reconstruction Using 2-D Ultrasound Vector Flow Imaging.
Zhou X; Vincent P; Zhou X; Leow CH; Tang MX
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Nov; 45(11):3042-3055. PubMed ID: 31378550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A phantom study comparing radial trajectories for accelerated cardiac 4D flow MRI against a particle imaging velocimetry reference.
Corrado PA; Medero R; Johnson KM; François CJ; Roldán-Alzate A; Wieben O
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Jul; 86(1):363-371. PubMed ID: 33547658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Left ventricular pacing vector selection by novel echo-particle imaging velocimetry analysis for optimization of quadripolar cardiac resynchronization device: a case report.
Martiniello AR; Pedrizzetti G; Bianchi V; Tonti G; D'Onofrio A; Caso P
J Med Case Rep; 2016 Jul; 10():191. PubMed ID: 27387667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Independent validation of four-dimensional flow MR velocities and vortex ring volume using particle imaging velocimetry and planar laser-Induced fluorescence.
Töger J; Bidhult S; Revstedt J; Carlsson M; Arheden H; Heiberg E
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Mar; 75(3):1064-75. PubMed ID: 25940239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Particle image velocimetry study of the celiac trunk hemodynamic induced by continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.
Scardulla F; Bellavia D; D'Acquisto L; Raffa GM; Pasta S
Med Eng Phys; 2017 Sep; 47():47-54. PubMed ID: 28709930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development of Ultrasound Phantom Made of Transparent Material: Feasibility of Optical Particle Image Velocimetry.
Hashuro MSS; Tupin S; Putra NK; Daibo K; Inoue K; Ishii T; Kosukegawa H; Funamoto K; Hayase T; Ohta M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Jun; 49(6):1385-1394. PubMed ID: 36878829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ventricular Flow Field Visualization During Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Assisted Isolated Beating Heart.
Aigner P; Schweiger M; Fraser K; Choi Y; Lemme F; Cesarovic N; Kertzscher U; Schima H; Hübler M; Granegger M
Ann Biomed Eng; 2020 Feb; 48(2):794-804. PubMed ID: 31741229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. How to optimize intracardiac blood flow tracking by echocardiographic particle image velocimetry? Exploring the influence of data acquisition using computer-generated data sets.
Gao H; Claus P; Amzulescu MS; Stankovic I; D'hooge J; Voigt JU
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 13(6):490-9. PubMed ID: 22173934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of ultrasound vector flow imaging and CFD simulations with PIV measurements of flow in a left ventricular outflow trackt phantom - Implications for clinical use and in silico studies.
Leinan PR; Grønli T; Skjetne P; Wigen MS; Urheim S; Lovstakken L; Dahl SK
Comput Biol Med; 2022 Jul; 146():105358. PubMed ID: 35751181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Real-time texture analysis for identifying optimum microbubble concentration in 2-D ultrasonic particle image velocimetry.
Niu L; Qian M; Yan L; Yu W; Jiang B; Jin Q; Wang Y; Shandas R; Liu X; Zheng H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1280-91. PubMed ID: 21684062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of intracranial aneurysm flow quantification techniques: standard PIV vs stereoscopic PIV vs tomographic PIV vs phase-contrast MRI vs CFD.
Roloff C; Stucht D; Beuing O; Berg P
J Neurointerv Surg; 2019 Mar; 11(3):275-282. PubMed ID: 30061369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Numerical modeling of microbubble backscatter to optimize ultrasound particle image velocimetry imaging: initial studies.
Mukdadi OM; Kim HB; Hertzberg J; Shandas R
Ultrasonics; 2004 Aug; 42(10):1111-21. PubMed ID: 15234173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
