These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31924454)
1. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Techniques for Bifurcation Disease: Network Meta-analysis Reveals Superiority of Double-Kissing Crush. Crimi G; Mandurino-Mirizzi A; Gritti V; Scotti V; Strozzi C; de Silvestri A; Montalto C; di Giacomo C; d'Ascenzo F; Repetto A; Ferlini M; Marinoni B; Ferrario M; de Servi S; Visconti LO; Klersy C Can J Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 36(6):906-914. PubMed ID: 31924454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis demonstrates superiority of double-kissing crush in complex lesions. Wang R; Ding Y; Yang J; Wang K; Gao W; Fang Z; Zhou Y; Ge H Clin Res Cardiol; 2022 Jul; 111(7):761-775. PubMed ID: 34862569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial. Chen SL; Zhang JJ; Han Y; Kan J; Chen L; Qiu C; Jiang T; Tao L; Zeng H; Li L; Xia Y; Gao C; Santoso T; Paiboon C; Wang Y; Kwan TW; Ye F; Tian N; Liu Z; Lin S; Lu C; Wen S; Hong L; Zhang Q; Sheiban I; Xu Y; Wang L; Rab TS; Li Z; Cheng G; Cui L; Leon MB; Stone GW J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 70(21):2605-2617. PubMed ID: 29096915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Outcomes Following Coronary Bifurcation PCI Techniques: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comprising 5,711 Patients. Di Gioia G; Sonck J; Ferenc M; Chen SL; Colaiori I; Gallinoro E; Mizukami T; Kodeboina M; Nagumo S; Franco D; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Wyffels E; De Bruyne B; Lassen JF; Bennett J; Vassilev D; Serruys PW; Stankovic G; Louvard Y; Barbato E; Collet C JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 13(12):1432-1444. PubMed ID: 32553331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Bayesian meta-analysis of double kissing (DK) crush or provisional stenting for coronary artery bifurcation lesions. Kumar A; Shariff M; Singal A; Bhat V; Stulak J; Reed G; Kalra A Indian Heart J; 2024; 76(2):113-117. PubMed ID: 38537883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized clinical study comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the DKCRUSH-II (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) trial. Chen SL; Santoso T; Zhang JJ; Ye F; Xu YW; Fu Q; Kan J; Paiboon C; Zhou Y; Ding SQ; Kwan TW J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Feb; 57(8):914-20. PubMed ID: 21329837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions). Chen SL; Santoso T; Zhang JJ; Ye F; Xu YW; Fu Q; Kan J; Zhang FF; Zhou Y; Xie DJ; Kwan TW Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 10(2):e004497. PubMed ID: 28122805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions: Evidence from a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Chiabrando JG; Lombardi M; Vescovo GM; Wohlford GF; Koenig RA; Abbate A; Guzmán LA; Berrocal DH; Biondi-Zoccai G Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Feb; 97(3):E306-E318. PubMed ID: 32662603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of double kissing crush versus Culotte stenting for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions: results from a multicenter, randomized, prospective DKCRUSH-III study. Chen SL; Xu B; Han YL; Sheiban I; Zhang JJ; Ye F; Kwan TW; Paiboon C; Zhou YJ; Lv SZ; Dangas GD; Xu YW; Wen SY; Hong L; Zhang RY; Wang HC; Jiang TM; Wang Y; Chen F; Yuan ZY; Li WM; Leon MB J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 61(14):1482-8. PubMed ID: 23490040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Different Stenting Techniques in Left Main Bifurcation Disease: Evidence From a Network Meta-Analysis. Vescovo GM; Chiabrando JG; Zivelonghi C; Romeo FJ; Lombardi M; Del Buono MG; Galli M; Biondi-Zoccai G; Wilgenhof A; Willemen Y; Scott B; Convens C; Verheye S; Vermeersch P; Agostoni P J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Apr; 34(4):E334-E342. PubMed ID: 35366228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Outcome After DK Crush Versus Culotte Stenting of Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: The 3-Year Follow-Up Results of the DKCRUSH-III Study. Chen SL; Xu B; Han YL; Sheiban I; Zhang JJ; Ye F; Kwan TW; Paiboon C; Zhou YJ; Lv SZ; Dangas GD; Xu YW; Wen SY; Hong L; Zhang RY; Wang HC; Jiang TM; Wang Y; Sansoto T; Chen F; Yuan ZY; Li WM; Leon MB JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 8(10):1335-1342. PubMed ID: 26315736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Five-year clinical follow-up of unprotected left main bifurcation lesion stenting: one-stent versus two-stent techniques versus double-kissing crush technique. Chen SL; Zhang Y; Xu B; Ye F; Zhang J; Tian N; Liu Z; Qian X; Ding S; Li F; Zhang A; Liu Y; Lin S EuroIntervention; 2012 Nov; 8(7):803-14. PubMed ID: 23171801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Bifurcation Techniques for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Park DY; An S; Jolly N; Attanasio S; Yadav N; Rao S; Vij A J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Jun; 11(12):e025394. PubMed ID: 35723005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3-Year Outcomes of the DKCRUSH-V Trial Comparing DK Crush With Provisional Stenting for Left Main Bifurcation Lesions. Chen X; Li X; Zhang JJ; Han Y; Kan J; Chen L; Qiu C; Santoso T; Paiboon C; Kwan TW; Sheiban I; Leon MB; Stone GW; Chen SL; JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(19):1927-1937. PubMed ID: 31521645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Angiographic and clinical outcomes after implantation of drug eluting stents in bifurcation lesions with crush or kissing stent technique. Cheema AN; Jolly SS; Burstein JM; Sharieff W; Mohammad A; Yeoh E; Mancini GB; Cantor WJ; Kutryk MJ; Strauss BH; Chisholm RJ J Interv Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 26(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 23406435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Crush versus Culotte stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials with long-term follow-up. Chen E; Cai W; Chen LL Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Apr; 98(14):e14865. PubMed ID: 30946314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized Comparison of FFR-Guided and Angiography-Guided Provisional Stenting of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-VI Trial (Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions VI). Chen SL; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Xu T; Tian NL; Liu ZZ; Lin S; Shan SJ; Ge Z; You W; Liu YQ; Qian XS; Li F; Yang S; Kwan TW; Xu B; Stone GW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(4):536-46. PubMed ID: 25819187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-Term Outcomes of Different Two-Stent Techniques With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Bifurcation Disease: Insights From the FAILS-2 Study. Pavani M; Conrotto F; Cerrato E; D'Ascenzo F; Kawamoto H; Núñez-Gil IJ; Pennone M; Garbo R; Tomassini F; Colombo F; Scacciatella P; Varbella F; Chieffo A; Colombo A; Escaned J J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Aug; 30(8):276-281. PubMed ID: 30068784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]