These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31925420)

  • 1. Septal contraction predicts acute haemodynamic improvement and paced QRS width reduction in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Ross S; Nestaas E; Kongsgaard E; Odland HH; Haland TF; Hopp E; Haugaa KH; Edvardsen T
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Aug; 21(8):845-852. PubMed ID: 31925420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cardiac resynchronization therapy when no lateral pacing option exists: vectorcardiographic guided non-lateral left ventricular lead placement predicts acute hemodynamic response.
    Ross S; Odland HH; Aranda A; Edvardsen T; Gammelsrud LO; Haland TF; Cornelussen R; Hopp E; Kongsgaard E
    Europace; 2018 Aug; 20(8):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 29036446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between two-dimensional speckle-tracking septal strain and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and left bundle branch block: a prospective pilot study.
    Maréchaux S; Guiot A; Castel AL; Guyomar Y; Semichon M; Delelis F; Heuls S; Ennezat PV; Graux P; Tribouilloy C
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 May; 27(5):501-11. PubMed ID: 24513239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strain-time curve analysis by speckle tracking echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Insight into the pathophysiology of responders vs. non-responders.
    To AC; Benatti RD; Sato K; Grimm RA; Thomas JD; Wilkoff BL; Agler D; Popović ZB
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2016 Apr; 14():14. PubMed ID: 27090784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acute biventricular hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in right bundle branch block.
    Houston BA; Sturdivant JL; Yu Y; Gold MR
    Heart Rhythm; 2018 Oct; 15(10):1525-1532. PubMed ID: 29800750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The concept of triple wavefront fusion during biventricular pacing: Using the EGM to produce the best acute hemodynamic improvement in CRT.
    Ter Horst IAH; Bogaard MD; Tuinenburg AE; Mast TP; de Boer TP; Doevendans PAFM; Meine M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Jul; 40(7):873-882. PubMed ID: 28543106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between endocardial activation sequences defined by high-density mapping to early septal contraction (septal flash) in patients with left bundle branch block undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Duckett SG; Camara O; Ginks MR; Bostock J; Chinchapatnam P; Sermesant M; Pashaei A; Lambiase PD; Gill JS; Carr-White GS; Frangi AF; Razavi R; Bijnens BH; Rinaldi CA
    Europace; 2012 Jan; 14(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 21752827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Risum N
    Dan Med J; 2014 Dec; 61(12):B4981. PubMed ID: 25441737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Baseline left ventricular dP/dtmax rather than the acute improvement in dP/dtmax predicts clinical outcome in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Bogaard MD; Houthuizen P; Bracke FA; Doevendans PA; Prinzen FW; Meine M; van Gelder BM
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2011 Oct; 13(10):1126-32. PubMed ID: 21791536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Atrioventricular delay programming and the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in MADIT-CRT.
    Brenyo A; Kutyifa V; Moss AJ; Mathias A; Barsheshet A; Pouleur AC; Knappe D; McNitt S; Polonsky B; Huang DT; Solomon SD; Zareba W; Goldenberg I
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Aug; 10(8):1136-43. PubMed ID: 23712031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. His-bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: A crossover design comparison.
    Lustgarten DL; Crespo EM; Arkhipova-Jenkins I; Lobel R; Winget J; Koehler J; Liberman E; Sheldon T
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Jul; 12(7):1548-57. PubMed ID: 25828601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incremental Value of Speckle Tracking Echocardiography to Predict Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Responders.
    Seo Y; Ishizu T; Machino-Ohtsuka T; Yamamoto M; Machino T; Kuroki K; Yamasaki H; Sekiguchi Y; Nogami A; Aonuma K
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Oct; 5(10):. PubMed ID: 27792652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Echocardiographic Prediction of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response Requires Analysis of Both Mechanical Dyssynchrony and Right Ventricular Function: A Combined Analysis of Patient Data and Computer Simulations.
    van Everdingen WM; Walmsley J; Cramer MJ; van Hagen I; De Boeck BWL; Meine M; Delhaas T; Doevendans PA; Prinzen FW; Lumens J; Leenders GE
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2017 Oct; 30(10):1012-1020.e2. PubMed ID: 28801203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multipoint pacing by a left ventricular quadripolar lead improves the acute hemodynamic response to CRT compared with conventional biventricular pacing at any site.
    Zanon F; Baracca E; Pastore G; Marcantoni L; Fraccaro C; Lanza D; Picariello C; Aggio S; Roncon L; Dell'Avvocata F; Rigatelli G; Pacetta D; Noventa F; Prinzen FW
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 May; 12(5):975-81. PubMed ID: 25625721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-Term Hemodynamic and Electrophysiological Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization by Left Ventricular Septal Pacing.
    Salden FCWM; Luermans JGLM; Westra SW; Weijs B; Engels EB; Heckman LIB; Lamerichs LJM; Janssen MHG; Clerx KJH; Cornelussen R; Ghosh S; Prinzen FW; Vernooy K
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2020 Feb; 75(4):347-359. PubMed ID: 32000945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Virtual pacing of a patient's digital twin to predict left ventricular reverse remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Koopsen T; Gerrits W; van Osta N; van Loon T; Wouters P; Prinzen FW; Vernooy K; Delhaas T; Teske AJ; Meine M; Cramer MJ; Lumens J
    Europace; 2023 Dec; 26(1):. PubMed ID: 38288616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incremental value of inefficient deformation indices for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Chan YH; Wu LS; Kuo CT; Wang CL; Yeh YH; Ho WJ; Hsu LA
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2013 Mar; 26(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 23218965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrical wavefront fusion in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block and cardiac resynchronization therapy: Implications for optimization.
    Bank AJ; Gage RM; Schaefer AE; Burns KV; Brown CD
    J Electrocardiol; 2020; 61():47-56. PubMed ID: 32526538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Site of latest activation in patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy: patterns of dyssynchrony among different QRS configurations and impact of heart failure etiology.
    van Bommel RJ; Ypenburg C; Mollema SA; Borleffs CJ; Delgado V; Bertini M; Marsan NA; van der Wall EE; Schalij MJ; Bax JJ
    Am Heart J; 2011 Jun; 161(6):1060-6. PubMed ID: 21641351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shortening of time-to-peak left ventricular pressure rise (Td) in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Odland HH; Villegas-Martinez M; Ross S; Holm T; Cornelussen R; Remme EW; Kongsgard E
    ESC Heart Fail; 2021 Dec; 8(6):5222-5236. PubMed ID: 34514746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.