These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31925476)

  • 1. Global-local processing and dispositional bias interact with emotion processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Kerusauskaite SG; Simione L; Raffone A; Srinivasan N
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Feb; 238(2):345-354. PubMed ID: 31925476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid communication: Global-local processing affects recognition of distractor emotional faces.
    Srinivasan N; Gupta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):425-33. PubMed ID: 21347993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When underadditivity of factor effects in the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm implies a bottleneck: evidence from psycholinguistics.
    Besner D; Reynolds M; O'Malley S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2222-34. PubMed ID: 19370482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional Bias towards Positive Emotion Predicts Stress Resilience.
    Thoern HA; Grueschow M; Ehlert U; Ruff CC; Kleim B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0148368. PubMed ID: 27008475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-modal psychological refractory period in vision, audition, and haptics.
    Rau PP; Zheng J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1573-1585. PubMed ID: 32052346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The locus of the emotional Stroop effect: a study with the PRP paradigm.
    Janczyk M; Augst S; Kunde W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():8-15. PubMed ID: 24904999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect.
    Bock O; Wechsler K; Koch I; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):568-576. PubMed ID: 31776662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unattended facial expressions asymmetrically bias the concurrent processing of nonemotional information.
    Maxwell JS; Shackman AJ; Davidson RJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 17(9):1386-95. PubMed ID: 16197692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do Arabic numerals activate magnitude automatically? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Ford N; Reynolds MG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1528-1533. PubMed ID: 27025502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonautomatic emotion perception in a dual-task situation.
    Tomasik D; Ruthruff E; Allen PA; Lien MC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):282-8. PubMed ID: 19293095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The cognitive loci of the display and task-relevant set size effects on distractor interference: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm.
    Park BY; Kim S; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):337-351. PubMed ID: 29124674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual Dominance Effect upon Passing the Central Bottleneck of Information Processing.
    Yao XQ; Yang YQ; Chen SY; Sun W; Chen Q
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2018 Aug; 131(16):1926-1935. PubMed ID: 30082523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contingent capture of visual-spatial attention depends on capacity-limited central mechanisms: evidence from human electrophysiology and the psychological refractory period.
    Brisson B; Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Feb; 80(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19000734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brain mechanisms of serial and parallel processing during dual-task performance.
    Sigman M; Dehaene S
    J Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 28(30):7585-98. PubMed ID: 18650336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating dual-task interference in children versus young adults with the overlapping task paradigm.
    Strobach T; Karbach J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Sep; 197():104866. PubMed ID: 32531496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift-diffusion model approach.
    Mattes A; Tavera F; Ophey A; Roheger M; Gaschler R; Haider H
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1529-1552. PubMed ID: 32335762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dual-task interference on left eye utilization during facial emotion perception.
    Duncan J; Dugas G; Brisson B; Blais C; Fiset D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1319-1330. PubMed ID: 31259582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are processing limitations of visual attention and response selection subject to the same bottleneck in dual-tasks?
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Frensch PA; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1052-69. PubMed ID: 25810162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.