These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31925557)

  • 1. Optimization of XCMS parameters for LC-MS metabolomics: an assessment of automated versus manual tuning and its effect on the final results.
    Albóniga OE; González O; Alonso RM; Xu Y; Goodacre R
    Metabolomics; 2020 Jan; 16(1):14. PubMed ID: 31925557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. IPO: a tool for automated optimization of XCMS parameters.
    Libiseller G; Dvorzak M; Kleb U; Gander E; Eisenberg T; Madeo F; Neumann S; Trausinger G; Sinner F; Pieber T; Magnes C
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Apr; 16():118. PubMed ID: 25888443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing XCMS parameters for GC-MS metabolomics data processing: a case study.
    Dos Santos EKP; Canuto GAB
    Metabolomics; 2023 Mar; 19(4):26. PubMed ID: 36976375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated optimization of XCMS parameters for improved peak picking of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data using the coefficient of variation and parameter sweeping for untargeted metabolomics.
    Manier SK; Keller A; Meyer MR
    Drug Test Anal; 2019 Jun; 11(6):752-761. PubMed ID: 30479047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of XCMS Optimization Methods with Machine-Learning Performance.
    Lassen J; Nielsen KL; Johannsen M; Villesen P
    Anal Chem; 2021 Oct; 93(40):13459-13466. PubMed ID: 34585906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-saving design of experiment protocol for optimization of LC-MS data processing in metabolomic approaches.
    Zheng H; Clausen MR; Dalsgaard TK; Mortensen G; Bertram HC
    Anal Chem; 2013 Aug; 85(15):7109-16. PubMed ID: 23841659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of preprocessing freeware on chromatography/mass spectrometry data for signature discovery.
    Coble JB; Fraga CG
    J Chromatogr A; 2014 Sep; 1358():155-64. PubMed ID: 25063004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detailed Investigation and Comparison of the XCMS and MZmine 2 Chromatogram Construction and Chromatographic Peak Detection Methods for Preprocessing Mass Spectrometry Metabolomics Data.
    Myers OD; Sumner SJ; Li S; Barnes S; Du X
    Anal Chem; 2017 Sep; 89(17):8689-8695. PubMed ID: 28752757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metabolomics Data Processing Using XCMS.
    Domingo-Almenara X; Siuzdak G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2104():11-24. PubMed ID: 31953810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of peak-picking workflows for untargeted liquid chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry metabolomics data analysis.
    Rafiei A; Sleno L
    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2015 Jan; 29(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 25462372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanistic Understanding of the Discrepancies between Common Peak Picking Algorithms in Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics.
    Guo J; Huan T
    Anal Chem; 2023 Apr; 95(14):5894-5902. PubMed ID: 36972195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correction of mass calibration gaps in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry metabolomics data.
    Benton HP; Want EJ; Ebbels TM
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct; 26(19):2488-9. PubMed ID: 20671148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescents: Q-TOF LC/MS analysis of human plasma metabolome.
    Çelebier M; Kaplan O; Özel Ş; Engin-Üstün Y
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2020 Nov; 191():113543. PubMed ID: 32871414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulated LC-MS Data Set for Assessing the Metabolomics Data Processing Pipeline Implemented into MVAPACK.
    Jurich CP; Jeppesen MJ; Sakallioglu IT; De Lima Leite A; Yesselman JD; Powers R
    Anal Chem; 2024 Aug; 96(32):12943-12956. PubMed ID: 39078713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Paramounter: Direct Measurement of Universal Parameters To Process Metabolomics Data in a "White Box".
    Guo J; Shen S; Huan T
    Anal Chem; 2022 Mar; 94(10):4260-4268. PubMed ID: 35245044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. xMSanalyzer: automated pipeline for improved feature detection and downstream analysis of large-scale, non-targeted metabolomics data.
    Uppal K; Soltow QA; Strobel FH; Pittard WS; Gernert KM; Yu T; Jones DP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Jan; 14():15. PubMed ID: 23323971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Highly automatic and universal approach for pure ion chromatogram construction from liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data using deep learning.
    Liao Y; Tian M; Zhang H; Lu H; Jiang Y; Chen Y; Zhang Z
    J Chromatogr A; 2023 Aug; 1705():464172. PubMed ID: 37392637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SLAW: A Scalable and Self-Optimizing Processing Workflow for Untargeted LC-MS.
    Delabriere A; Warmer P; Brennsteiner V; Zamboni N
    Anal Chem; 2021 Nov; 93(45):15024-15032. PubMed ID: 34735114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MetaboAnalystR 4.0: a unified LC-MS workflow for global metabolomics.
    Pang Z; Xu L; Viau C; Lu Y; Salavati R; Basu N; Xia J
    Nat Commun; 2024 May; 15(1):3675. PubMed ID: 38693118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Metabolomics Workflow for Analyzing Complex Biological Samples Using a Combined Method of Untargeted and Target-List Based Approaches.
    Züllig T; Zandl-Lang M; Trötzmüller M; Hartler J; Plecko B; Köfeler HC
    Metabolites; 2020 Aug; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 32854199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.