These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31926362)
41. Stakeholder Perspectives on Standardizing the Residency Application and Interview Processes. Hammoud MM; Winkel AF; Strand EA; Worly BL; Marzano DA; Bronner BA; Forstein DA; Katz NT; Woodland MB; Morgan HK J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(4):1103-1110. PubMed ID: 33199253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Correlation of personality assessments with standard selection criteria for neurosurgical residency applicants. Lubelski D; Healy AT; Friedman A; Ferraris D; Benzel EC; Schlenk R J Neurosurg; 2016 Oct; 125(4):986-994. PubMed ID: 26848920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Neurosurgery Resident Interviews: The Prevalence and Impact of Inappropriate and Potentially Illegal Questions. Limoges N; Zuckerman SL; Chambless LB; Benzil DL; Cruz A; Borden JH; Durham S Neurosurgery; 2021 Jun; 89(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 33733664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors' standardized letter of recommendation: the program director's perspective. Love JN; Smith J; Weizberg M; Doty CI; Garra G; Avegno J; Howell JM; Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Jun; 21(6):680-7. PubMed ID: 25039553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The predictive value of application variables on the global rating of applicants to a general surgery residency program. Sharp C; Plank A; Dove J; Woll N; Hunsinger M; Morgan A; Blansfield J; Shabahang M J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(1):148-55. PubMed ID: 25091382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Resident selection criteria for advanced education in prosthodontic programs: program directors' perspective. Yuan JC; Lee DJ; Knoernschild KL; Campbell SD; Sukotjo C J Prosthodont; 2010 Jun; 19(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 20210858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Factors used by program directors to select hand surgery fellows. Nies MS; Bollinger AJ; Cassidy C; Jebson PJ J Hand Surg Am; 2014 Nov; 39(11):2285-2288.e5. PubMed ID: 25169418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Gender-based differences in letters of recommendation written for ophthalmology residency applicants. Lin F; Oh SK; Gordon LK; Pineles SL; Rosenberg JB; Tsui I BMC Med Educ; 2019 Dec; 19(1):476. PubMed ID: 31888607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Letter of Recommendation Characteristics Associated with Interview Offer to a Vascular Surgery Residency Program. Rodriguez S; Sedani A; Patel N; Mukherjee R; Wooster M; Veeraswamy R; Tanious A Ann Vasc Surg; 2024 Dec; 109():382-395. PubMed ID: 39019255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process: An Analysis of the Applicant Experience. Ramkumar PN; Navarro SM; Chughtai M; Haeberle HS; Taylor SA; Mont MA J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 26(15):537-544. PubMed ID: 29870416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Use of standardized letters of recommendation for otolaryngology head and neck surgery residency and the impact of gender. Friedman R; Fang CH; Hasbun J; Han H; Mady LJ; Eloy JA; Kalyoussef E Laryngoscope; 2017 Dec; 127(12):2738-2745. PubMed ID: 28786169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs. Dort JM; Trickey AW; Kallies KJ; Joshi AR; Sidwell RA; Jarman BT J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):e123-9. PubMed ID: 26073713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Do You Really Mean It? Assessing the Strength, Frequency, and Reliability of Applicant Commitment Statements During the Anesthesiology Residency Match. Moran KR; Schell RM; Smith KA; Abdel-Rasoul M; Lekowski RW; Rankin DD; DiLorenzo A; McEvoy MD Anesth Analg; 2019 Sep; 129(3):847-854. PubMed ID: 31425229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Asking for a commitment: violations during the 2007 match and the effect on applicant rank lists. Hern HG; Johnson B; Alter HJ; Wills CP; Snoey ER; Simon BC West J Emerg Med; 2015 Mar; 16(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 25834683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The Presence of Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendations Written for Urology Residency Applicants. Filippou P; Mahajan S; Deal A; Wallen EM; Tan HJ; Pruthi RS; Smith AB Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():56-61. PubMed ID: 31491451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Use of Asynchronous Video Interviews for Selecting Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents. Breitkopf DM; Green IC; Hopkins MR; Torbenson VE; Camp CL; Turner NS Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 134 Suppl 1():9S-15S. PubMed ID: 31568035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Utilization of a Novel Program-Specific Evaluation Tool Results in a Decidedly Different Interview Pool Than Traditional Application Review. Lyons J; Bingmer K; Ammori J; Marks J J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(6):e110-e117. PubMed ID: 31668694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Applicants' opinions about the selection process for oral and maxillofacial surgery programs. Marciani RD; Smith TA; Heaton LJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 May; 61(5):608-14. PubMed ID: 12730841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]