136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31926590)
1. Evaluation of human nasal cartilage nonlinear and rate dependent mechanical properties.
Chang B; Reighard C; Flanagan C; Hollister S; Zopf D
J Biomech; 2020 Feb; 100():109549. PubMed ID: 31926590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of hMSCs-based engineered cartilage for chondral tissue regeneration.
Gullotta F; Izzo D; Scalera F; Palazzo B; Martin I; Sannino A; Gervaso F
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Oct; 86():294-304. PubMed ID: 30006278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-material 3D bioprinting of porous constructs for cartilage regeneration.
Ruiz-Cantu L; Gleadall A; Faris C; Segal J; Shakesheff K; Yang J
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Apr; 109():110578. PubMed ID: 32228894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical, permeability, and degradation properties of 3D designed poly(1,8 octanediol-co-citrate) scaffolds for soft tissue engineering.
Jeong CG; Hollister SJ
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2010 Apr; 93(1):141-9. PubMed ID: 20091910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Generating Mechanically Stable, Pediatric, and Scaffold-Free Nasal Cartilage Constructs In Vitro.
Akbari P; Waldman SD; Propst EJ; Cushing SL; Weber JF; Yeger H; Farhat WA
Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2016 Dec; 22(12):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 27829311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of human and porcine auricular cartilage.
Zopf DA; Flanagan CL; Nasser HB; Mitsak AG; Huq FS; Rajendran V; Green GE; Hollister SJ
Laryngoscope; 2015 Aug; 125(8):E262-8. PubMed ID: 25891012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pore orientation mediated control of mechanical behavior of scaffolds and its application in cartilage-mimetic scaffold design.
Arora A; Kothari A; Katti DS
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Nov; 51():169-83. PubMed ID: 26256472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A pilot study comparing mechanical properties of tissue-engineered cartilages and various endogenous cartilages.
Pappa AK; Soleimani S; Caballero M; Halevi AE; van Aalst JA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Dec; 50():105-109. PubMed ID: 29055244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental verification of the roles of intrinsic matrix viscoelasticity and tension-compression nonlinearity in the biphasic response of cartilage.
Huang CY; Soltz MA; Kopacz M; Mow VC; Ateshian GA
J Biomech Eng; 2003 Feb; 125(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 12661200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between micro-porosity, water permeability and mechanical behavior in scaffolds for cartilage engineering.
Vikingsson L; Claessens B; Gómez-Tejedor JA; Gallego Ferrer G; Gómez Ribelles JL
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Aug; 48():60-69. PubMed ID: 25913609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tissue-engineered cartilage for facial plastic surgery.
Watson D; Reuther MS
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Aug; 22(4):300-6. PubMed ID: 24874211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic response of immature bovine articular cartilage in tension and compression, and nonlinear viscoelastic modeling of the tensile response.
Park S; Ateshian GA
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Aug; 128(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 16813454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical characterisation of the human nasal cartilages; implications for tissue engineering.
Griffin MF; Premakumar Y; Seifalian AM; Szarko M; Butler PE
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2016 Jan; 27(1):11. PubMed ID: 26676857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unconfined compression of articular cartilage: nonlinear behavior and comparison with a fibril-reinforced biphasic model.
Fortin M; Soulhat J; Shirazi-Adl A; Hunziker EB; Buschmann MD
J Biomech Eng; 2000 Apr; 122(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 10834160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiscale mechanics of tissue-engineered cartilage grown from human chondrocytes and human-induced pluripotent stem cells.
Middendorf JM; Diamantides N; Shortkroff S; Dugopolski C; Kennedy S; Cohen I; Bonassar LJ
J Orthop Res; 2020 Sep; 38(9):1965-1973. PubMed ID: 32125023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finite element simulation of location- and time-dependent mechanical behavior of chondrocytes in unconfined compression tests.
Wu JZ; Herzog W
Ann Biomed Eng; 2000 Mar; 28(3):318-30. PubMed ID: 10784096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parametric finite element analysis of physical stimuli resulting from mechanical stimulation of tissue engineered cartilage.
Babalola OM; Bonassar LJ
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Jun; 131(6):061014. PubMed ID: 19449968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhanced nutrient transport improves the depth-dependent properties of tri-layered engineered cartilage constructs with zonal co-culture of chondrocytes and MSCs.
Kim M; Farrell MJ; Steinberg DR; Burdick JA; Mauck RL
Acta Biomater; 2017 Aug; 58():1-11. PubMed ID: 28629894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combination of bioactive factors and IEIK13 self-assembling peptide hydrogel promotes cartilage matrix production by human nasal chondrocytes.
Dufour A; Buffier M; Vertu-Ciolino D; Disant F; Mallein-Gerin F; Perrier-Groult E
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2019 Apr; 107(4):893-903. PubMed ID: 30650239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A viscoelastic chitosan-modified three-dimensional porous poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering.
Li C; Wang L; Yang Z; Kim G; Chen H; Ge Z
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2012; 23(1-4):405-24. PubMed ID: 21310105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
