1066 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31926806)
1. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists.
Bulten W; Balkenhol M; Belinga JA; Brilhante A; Çakır A; Egevad L; Eklund M; Farré X; Geronatsiou K; Molinié V; Pereira G; Roy P; Saile G; Salles P; Schaafsma E; Tschui J; Vos AM; ; van Boven H; Vink R; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van der Kaa C; Litjens G
Mod Pathol; 2021 Mar; 34(3):660-671. PubMed ID: 32759979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Use of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Pathologist Assessment to Review and Grade Prostate Biopsies.
Steiner DF; Nagpal K; Sayres R; Foote DJ; Wedin BD; Pearce A; Cai CJ; Winter SR; Symonds M; Yatziv L; Kapishnikov A; Brown T; Flament-Auvigne I; Tan F; Stumpe MC; Jiang PP; Liu Y; Chen PC; Corrado GS; Terry M; Mermel CH
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2023267. PubMed ID: 33180129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial intelligence system shows performance at the level of uropathologists for the detection and grading of prostate cancer in core needle biopsy: an independent external validation study.
Jung M; Jin MS; Kim C; Lee C; Nikas IP; Park JH; Ryu HS
Mod Pathol; 2022 Oct; 35(10):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 35487950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsies with deep neural networks.
Kartasalo K; Ström P; Ruusuvuori P; Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Tsuzuki T; Eklund M; Egevad L
Virchows Arch; 2022 Jul; 481(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 35449363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50-69 years (STHLM3): a prospective population-based diagnostic study.
Grönberg H; Adolfsson J; Aly M; Nordström T; Wiklund P; Brandberg Y; Thompson J; Wiklund F; Lindberg J; Clements M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2015 Dec; 16(16):1667-76. PubMed ID: 26563502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
Nordström T; Discacciati A; Bergman M; Clements M; Aly M; Annerstedt M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Jäderling F; Eklund M; Grönberg H;
Lancet Oncol; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 34391509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer in Biopsies-Current Status and Next Steps.
Kartasalo K; Bulten W; Delahunt B; Chen PC; Pinckaers H; Olsson H; Ji X; Mulliqi N; Samaratunga H; Tsuzuki T; Lindberg J; Rantalainen M; Wählby C; Litjens G; Ruusuvuori P; Egevad L; Eklund M
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jul; 7(4):687-691. PubMed ID: 34393083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection.
Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105637. PubMed ID: 32653747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50 to 69 years (STHLM3): A prospective population-based diagnostic study. Grönberg H, Adolfsson J, Aly M, Nordström T, Wiklund P, Brandberg Y, Thompson J, Wiklund F, Lindberg J, Clements M, Egevad L, Eklund M.Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1667-76. [Epub 2015 Nov 10]. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00361-7.
Scott E; Adolfsson J; Aly M; Nordström T; Wiklund P; Brandberg Y; Thompson J; Wiklund F; Lindberg J; Clements M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Urol Oncol; 2017 Mar; 35(3):120. PubMed ID: 28215847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer.
Ozkan TA; Eruyar AT; Cebeci OO; Memik O; Ozcan L; Kuskonmaz I
Scand J Urol; 2016 Dec; 50(6):420-424. PubMed ID: 27416104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Critical evaluation of artificial intelligence as a digital twin of pathologists for prostate cancer pathology.
Eminaga O; Abbas M; Kunder C; Tolkach Y; Han R; Brooks JD; Nolley R; Semjonow A; Boegemann M; West R; Long J; Fan RE; Bettendorf O
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):5284. PubMed ID: 38438436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of areas of grading difficulties in prostate cancer and comparison with artificial intelligence assisted grading.
Egevad L; Swanberg D; Delahunt B; Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; van der Kwast T; Varma M; Zhou M; Clements M; Eklund M
Virchows Arch; 2020 Dec; 477(6):777-786. PubMed ID: 32542445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
