1054 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31926806)
21. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. WeGleNet: A weakly-supervised convolutional neural network for the semantic segmentation of Gleason grades in prostate histology images.
Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Naranjo V
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2021 Mar; 88():101846. PubMed ID: 33485056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Pathology for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Sweden: A Microsimulation Study.
Du X; Hao S; Olsson H; Kartasalo K; Mulliqi N; Rai B; Menges D; Heintz E; Egevad L; Eklund M; Clements M
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38789385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Independent real-world application of a clinical-grade automated prostate cancer detection system.
da Silva LM; Pereira EM; Salles PG; Godrich R; Ceballos R; Kunz JD; Casson A; Viret J; Chandarlapaty S; Ferreira CG; Ferrari B; Rothrock B; Raciti P; Reuter V; Dogdas B; DeMuth G; Sue J; Kanan C; Grady L; Fuchs TJ; Reis-Filho JS
J Pathol; 2021 Jun; 254(2):147-158. PubMed ID: 33904171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Development and validation of artificial intelligence-based prescreening of large-bowel biopsies taken in the UK and Portugal: a retrospective cohort study.
Bilal M; Tsang YW; Ali M; Graham S; Hero E; Wahab N; Dodd K; Sahota H; Wu S; Lu W; Jahanifar M; Robinson A; Azam A; Benes K; Nimir M; Hewitt K; Bhalerao A; Eldaly H; Raza SEA; Gopalakrishnan K; Minhas F; Snead D; Rajpoot N
Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Nov; 5(11):e786-e797. PubMed ID: 37890902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Histopathologic Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: A Pilot Study.
Kott O; Linsley D; Amin A; Karagounis A; Jeffers C; Golijanin D; Serre T; Gershman B
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):347-351. PubMed ID: 31767543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dataset for the reporting of prostate carcinoma in core needle biopsy and transurethral resection and enucleation specimens: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR).
Egevad L; Judge M; Delahunt B; Humphrey PA; Kristiansen G; Oxley J; Rasiah K; Takahashi H; Trpkov K; Varma M; Wheeler TM; Zhou M; Srigley JR; Kench JG
Pathology; 2019 Jan; 51(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 30477882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Deep Learning Approach to Diagnostic Classification of Prostate Cancer Using Pathology-Radiology Fusion.
Khosravi P; Lysandrou M; Eljalby M; Li Q; Kazemi E; Zisimopoulos P; Sigaras A; Brendel M; Barnes J; Ricketts C; Meleshko D; Yat A; McClure TD; Robinson BD; Sboner A; Elemento O; Chughtai B; Hajirasouliha I
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Aug; 54(2):462-471. PubMed ID: 33719168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Automatic grading of prostate cancer in digitized histopathology images: Learning from multiple experts.
Nir G; Hor S; Karimi D; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Wilson RS; Iczkowski KA; Lucia MS; Black PC; Abolmaesumi P; Goldenberg SL; Salcudean SE
Med Image Anal; 2018 Dec; 50():167-180. PubMed ID: 30340027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.
Danneman D; Drevin L; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Robinson D; Bratt O; Loeb S; Stattin P; Egevad L
BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 26918298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Artificial intelligence-based model for lymph node metastases detection on whole slide images in bladder cancer: a retrospective, multicentre, diagnostic study.
Wu S; Hong G; Xu A; Zeng H; Chen X; Wang Y; Luo Y; Wu P; Liu C; Jiang N; Dang Q; Yang C; Liu B; Shen R; Chen Z; Liao C; Lin Z; Wang J; Lin T
Lancet Oncol; 2023 Apr; 24(4):360-370. PubMed ID: 36893772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of Classic and International Society of Urological Pathology 2005 Modified Gleason grading using needle biopsies from the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) trial.
Lucia MS; Bostwick DG; Somerville MC; Fowler IL; Rittmaster RS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Dec; 137(12):1740-6. PubMed ID: 24283854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prostate needle biopsy examination by means of virtual microscopy.
Chargari C; Comperat E; Magné N; Védrine L; Houlgatte A; Egevad L; Camparo P
Pathol Res Pract; 2011 Jun; 207(6):366-9. PubMed ID: 21570778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An independent assessment of an artificial intelligence system for prostate cancer detection shows strong diagnostic accuracy.
Perincheri S; Levi AW; Celli R; Gershkovich P; Rimm D; Morrow JS; Rothrock B; Raciti P; Klimstra D; Sinard J
Mod Pathol; 2021 Aug; 34(8):1588-1595. PubMed ID: 33782551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation.
Karimi D; Nir G; Fazli L; Black PC; Goldenberg L; Salcudean SE
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 May; 24(5):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 31567104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An international multi-institutional validation study of the algorithm for prostate cancer detection and Gleason grading.
Tolkach Y; Ovtcharov V; Pryalukhin A; Eich ML; Gaisa NT; Braun M; Radzhabov A; Quaas A; Hammerer P; Dellmann A; Hulla W; Haffner MC; Reis H; Fahoum I; Samarska I; Borbat A; Pham H; Heidenreich A; Klein S; Netto G; Caie P; Buettner R
NPJ Precis Oncol; 2023 Aug; 7(1):77. PubMed ID: 37582946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Digital Biopsy with Fluorescence Confocal Microscope for Effective Real-time Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Prospective, Comparative Study.
Rocco B; Sighinolfi MC; Sandri M; Spandri V; Cimadamore A; Volavsek M; Mazzucchelli R; Lopez-Beltran A; Eissa A; Bertoni L; Azzoni P; Reggiani Bonetti L; Maiorana A; Puliatti S; Micali S; Paterlini M; Iseppi A; Rocco F; Pellacani G; Chester J; Bianchi G; Montironi R
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):784-791. PubMed ID: 32952095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer histology identification and grading.
Morozov A; Taratkin M; Bazarkin A; Rivas JG; Puliatti S; Checcucci E; Belenchon IR; Kowalewski KF; Shpikina A; Singla N; Teoh JYC; Kozlov V; Rodler S; Piazza P; Fajkovic H; Yakimov M; Abreu AL; Cacciamani GE; Enikeev D;
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Dec; 26(4):681-692. PubMed ID: 37185992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies.
Lucas M; Jansen I; Savci-Heijink CD; Meijer SL; de Boer OJ; van Leeuwen TG; de Bruin DM; Marquering HA
Virchows Arch; 2019 Jul; 475(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 31098801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
