195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31926812)
1. A novel tDCS sham approach based on model-driven controlled shunting.
Neri F; Mencarelli L; Menardi A; Giovannelli F; Rossi S; Sprugnoli G; Rossi A; Pascual-Leone A; Salvador R; Ruffini G; Santarnecchi E
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(2):507-516. PubMed ID: 31926812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tolerability and blinding of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation among older adults at intensities of up to 4 mA per electrode.
El Jamal C; Harrie A; Rahman-Filipiak A; Iordan AD; DaSilva AF; Ploutz-Snyder R; Khadr L; Vesia M; Bikson M; Hampstead BM
Brain Stimul; 2023; 16(5):1328-1335. PubMed ID: 37660936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
Labruna L; Jamil A; Fresnoza S; Batsikadze G; Kuo MF; Vanderschelden B; Ivry RB; Nitsche MA
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 26493498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corticospinal excitability enhancement with simultaneous transcranial near-infrared stimulation and anodal direct current stimulation of motor cortex.
Song P; Li S; Hao W; Wei M; Liu J; Lin H; Hu S; Dai X; Wang J; Wang R; Wang Y
Clin Neurophysiol; 2021 May; 132(5):1018-1024. PubMed ID: 33743296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differential effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal, motor and somatosensory cortices on cortical excitability and pain perception - a double-blind randomised sham-controlled study.
Vaseghi B; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 42(7):2426-37. PubMed ID: 26275236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.
Jamil A; Batsikadze G; Kuo HI; Labruna L; Hasan A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
J Physiol; 2017 Feb; 595(4):1273-1288. PubMed ID: 27723104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex.
Wiethoff S; Hamada M; Rothwell JC
Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(3):468-75. PubMed ID: 24630848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial and polarity precision of concentric high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS).
Alam M; Truong DQ; Khadka N; Bikson M
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jun; 61(12):4506-21. PubMed ID: 27223853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Blinding is compromised for transcranial direct current stimulation at 1 mA for 20 min in young healthy adults.
Turi Z; Csifcsák G; Boayue NM; Aslaksen P; Antal A; Paulus W; Groot J; Hawkins GE; Forstmann B; Opitz A; Thielscher A; Mittner M
Eur J Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 50(8):3261-3268. PubMed ID: 30888090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The association of motor imagery and kinesthetic illusion prolongs the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal tract excitability.
Kaneko F; Shibata E; Hayami T; Nagahata K; Aoyama T
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 13():36. PubMed ID: 27079199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tolerability and blinding of 4x1 high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) at two and three milliamps.
Reckow J; Rahman-Filipiak A; Garcia S; Schlaefflin S; Calhoun O; DaSilva AF; Bikson M; Hampstead BM
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(5):991-997. PubMed ID: 29784589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What is the optimal anodal electrode position for inducing corticomotor excitability changes in transcranial direct current stimulation?
Lee M; Kim YH; Im CH; Kim JH; Park CH; Chang WH; Lee A
Neurosci Lett; 2015 Jan; 584():347-50. PubMed ID: 25450146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preconditioning cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates the neuroplastic effect of subsequent anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied during cycling in young adults.
Pourmajidian M; Lauber B; Sidhu SK
Neurosci Lett; 2020 Jan; 714():134597. PubMed ID: 31689457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.
Horvath JC; Vogrin SJ; Carter O; Cook MJ; Forte JD
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The time course of ineffective sham-blinding during low-intensity (1 mA) transcranial direct current stimulation.
Greinacher R; Buhôt L; Möller L; Learmonth G
Eur J Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 50(8):3380-3388. PubMed ID: 31228880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validating a Sham Condition for Use in High Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Garnett EO; den Ouden DB
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):551-4. PubMed ID: 25686528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Electrode Size and Current Intensity on Motor Cortical Excitability: Evidence From Single and Repeated Sessions.
Ho KA; Taylor JL; Chew T; Gálvez V; Alonzo A; Bai S; Dokos S; Loo CK
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26350410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Voluntary movement reverses the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability.
Ataoglu EE; Caglayan HB; Cengiz B
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2653-2659. PubMed ID: 28577024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
