195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31926812)
21. Ca2+ channel dynamics explain the nonlinear neuroplasticity induction by cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex.
Mosayebi-Samani M; Melo L; Agboada D; Nitsche MA; Kuo MF
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2020 Sep; 38():63-72. PubMed ID: 32768154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The neurophysiological aftereffects of brain stimulation in human primary motor cortex: a Sham-controlled comparison of three protocols.
Therrien-Blanchet JM; Ferland MC; Badri M; Rousseau MA; Merabtine A; Boucher E; Hofmann LH; Lepage JF; Théoret H
Cereb Cortex; 2023 May; 33(11):7061-7075. PubMed ID: 36749004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.
Tremblay S; Larochelle-Brunet F; Lafleur LP; El Mouderrib S; Lepage JF; Théoret H
Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2184-90. PubMed ID: 27336413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Determination of anodal tDCS duration threshold for reversal of corticospinal excitability: An investigation for induction of counter-regulatory mechanisms.
Hassanzahraee M; Nitsche MA; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(3):832-839. PubMed ID: 32289714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.
Laczó B; Antal A; Rothkegel H; Paulus W
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 24576783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reduced Current Spread by Concentric Electrodes in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES).
Bortoletto M; Rodella C; Salvador R; Miranda PC; Miniussi C
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 27061368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans.
Bashir S; Ahmad S; Alatefi M; Hamza A; Sharaf M; Fecteau S; Yoo WK
Physiol Rep; 2019 Jul; 7(13):e14087. PubMed ID: 31301123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow.
Rawji V; Ciocca M; Zacharia A; Soares D; Truong D; Bikson M; Rothwell J; Bestmann S
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(2):289-298. PubMed ID: 29146468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Tolerability of Repeated Application of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation with Limited Outputs to Healthy Subjects.
Paneri B; Adair D; Thomas C; Khadka N; Patel V; Tyler WJ; Parra L; Bikson M
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(5):740-754. PubMed ID: 27372844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effects of concurrent bilateral anodal tDCS of primary motor cortex and cerebellum on corticospinal excitability: a randomized, double-blind sham-controlled study.
Behrangrad S; Zoghi M; Kidgell D; Mansouri F; Jaberzadeh S
Brain Struct Funct; 2022 Sep; 227(7):2395-2408. PubMed ID: 35984496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Multifocal tDCS targeting the resting state motor network increases cortical excitability beyond traditional tDCS targeting unilateral motor cortex.
Fischer DB; Fried PJ; Ruffini G; Ripolles O; Salvador R; Banus J; Ketchabaw WT; Santarnecchi E; Pascual-Leone A; Fox MD
Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():34-44. PubMed ID: 28572060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Corticomotor excitability induced by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation with and without non-exhaustive movement.
Miyaguchi S; Onishi H; Kojima S; Sugawara K; Tsubaki A; Kirimoto H; Tamaki H; Yamamoto N
Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 1529():83-91. PubMed ID: 23891715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Genetic Polymorphisms Do Not Predict Interindividual Variability to Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex.
Pellegrini M; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
Brain Connect; 2021 Feb; 11(1):56-72. PubMed ID: 33198509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Simultaneous stimulation using rTMS and tDCS produces the most effective modulation of motor cortical excitability in healthy subjects: A pilot study.
Wang H; Wang X; Jin J; Zhang W; Li Y; Liu Z; Yin T
Neurosci Lett; 2019 Feb; 694():46-50. PubMed ID: 30342993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Neurophysiological signatures of hand motor response to dual-transcranial direct current stimulation in subacute stroke: a TMS and MEG study.
Kuo IJ; Tang CW; Tsai YA; Tang SC; Lin CJ; Hsu SP; Liang WK; Juan CH; Zich C; Stagg CJ; Lee IH
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Jun; 17(1):72. PubMed ID: 32527268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Is the "end-of-study guess" a valid measure of sham blinding during transcranial direct current stimulation?
Turner C; Jackson C; Learmonth G
Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 53(5):1592-1604. PubMed ID: 33098709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five anodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 24hours.
Zappasodi F; Musumeci G; Navarra R; Di Lazzaro V; Caulo M; Uncini A
Neurophysiol Clin; 2019 Feb; 49(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 30635162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach.
Pellicciari MC; Brignani D; Miniussi C
Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():569-80. PubMed ID: 23845429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of network-targeted multichannel transcranial direct current stimulation on intrinsic and network-to-network functional connectivity.
Mencarelli L; Menardi A; Neri F; Monti L; Ruffini G; Salvador R; Pascual-Leone A; Momi D; Sprugnoli G; Rossi A; Rossi S; Santarnecchi E
J Neurosci Res; 2020 Oct; 98(10):1843-1856. PubMed ID: 32686203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a submaximal contraction of elbow flexors without changing corticospinal excitability.
Abdelmoula A; Baudry S; Duchateau J
Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():94-103. PubMed ID: 26892298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
