These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31926812)

  • 41. Sham transcranial electrical stimulation and its effects on corticospinal excitability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dissanayaka TD; Zoghi M; Farrell M; Egan GF; Jaberzadeh S
    Rev Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 29(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 28889119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Stimulation intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation have to be adjusted in children and adolescents.
    Moliadze V; Schmanke T; Andreas S; Lyzhko E; Freitag CM; Siniatchkin M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 126(7):1392-9. PubMed ID: 25468234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Modulation of cortical responses by transcranial direct current stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A resting-state EEG and TMS-EEG study.
    Gordon PC; Zrenner C; Desideri D; Belardinelli P; Zrenner B; Brunoni AR; Ziemann U
    Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(5):1024-1032. PubMed ID: 29921529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Perceived Comfort and Blinding Efficacy in Randomised Sham-Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Trials at 2 mA in Young and Older Healthy Adults.
    Wallace D; Cooper NR; Paulmann S; Fitzgerald PB; Russo R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149703. PubMed ID: 26900961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Individually optimized multi-channel tDCS for targeting somatosensory cortex.
    Khan A; Antonakakis M; Vogenauer N; Haueisen J; Wolters CH
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2022 Feb; 134():9-26. PubMed ID: 34923283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation over the cerebellum differentially affect the cerebellum and primary motor cortex pathway.
    Kawakami S; Inukai Y; Ikarashi H; Watanabe H; Miyaguchi S; Otsuru N; Onishi H
    J Clin Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 100():59-65. PubMed ID: 35421743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of multifocal transcranial direct current stimulation targeting the motor network during prolonged experimental pain.
    Gregoret L; Zamorano AM; Graven-Nielsen T
    Eur J Pain; 2021 Jul; 25(6):1241-1253. PubMed ID: 33539582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Priming the Motor Cortex With Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Affects the Acute Inhibitory Corticospinal Responses to Strength Training.
    Frazer AK; Howatson G; Ahtiainen JP; Avela J; Rantalainen T; Kidgell DJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Feb; 33(2):307-317. PubMed ID: 30688872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Simultaneously applying cathodal tDCS with low frequency rTMS at the motor cortex boosts inhibitory aftereffects.
    Han T; Xu Z; Liu C; Li S; Song P; Huang Q; Zhou Q; Lin Y; Wang Y
    J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Aug; 324():108308. PubMed ID: 31181244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Current intensity- and polarity-specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study.
    Jamil A; Batsikadze G; Kuo HI; Meesen RLJ; Dechent P; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Apr; 41(6):1644-1666. PubMed ID: 31860160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation increases corticospinal excitability, while performance is unchanged.
    Kristiansen M; Thomsen MJ; Nørgaard J; Aaes J; Knudsen D; Voigt M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0254888. PubMed ID: 34270614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Effects of Monophasic Anodal Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability and Motor Performance in Healthy Young Adults: A Randomized Double-Blinded Sham-Controlled Study.
    Dissanayaka T; Zoghi M; Farrell M; Egan G; Jaberzadeh S
    Brain Connect; 2022 Apr; 12(3):260-274. PubMed ID: 34963309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Failure of tDCS to modulate motor excitability and speech motor learning.
    Wiltshire CEE; Watkins KE
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Sep; 146():107568. PubMed ID: 32687836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities.
    Chew T; Ho KA; Loo CK
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1130-7. PubMed ID: 26294061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials.
    Palm U; Reisinger E; Keeser D; Kuo MF; Pogarell O; Leicht G; Mulert C; Nitsche MA; Padberg F
    Brain Stimul; 2013 Jul; 6(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 23415938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability.
    Lang N; Nitsche MA; Paulus W; Rothwell JC; Lemon RN
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 156(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 14745467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Shows Minimal, Measure-Specific Effects on Dynamic Postural Control in Young and Older Adults: A Double Blind, Sham-Controlled Study.
    Craig CE; Doumas M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170331. PubMed ID: 28099522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Exploring and optimizing the neuroplastic effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex of older humans.
    Farnad L; Ghasemian-Shirvan E; Mosayebi-Samani M; Kuo MF; Nitsche MA
    Brain Stimul; 2021; 14(3):622-634. PubMed ID: 33798763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Can genetic polymorphisms predict response variability to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex?
    Pellegrini M; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 53(5):1569-1591. PubMed ID: 33048398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Women report more severe sensations from 2 mA and 4 mA transcranial direct current stimulation than men.
    Workman CD; Fietsam AC; Kamholz J; Rudroff T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 53(8):2696-2702. PubMed ID: 33259084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.